> https://skepticalscience.com/Examining-Hansens-prediction-ab... LOL! You literally just linked to the exact thing that I referred to! Did you miss it? I said that Hansen was dumb enough to repeat his prediction, but…
[flagged]
> "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law." Yes that's true ...and totally irrelevant. Trump is NOT drawing money from the treasury. He is performing the executive…
> This isn't in the presidential powers. Yes it is! It is literally the first sentence of section 1 of Article II of the constitution! Saying, "I don't like this therefore it's not in his power" is logically identical…
> unlimited access to classified government computer systems. What makes you think they have access to classified government computer systems, let alone unlimited access? It's my understanding that classified data is on…
> https://skepticalscience.com/Examining-Hansens-prediction-ab... LOL! You literally just linked to the exact thing that I referred to! Did you miss it? I said that Hansen was dumb enough to repeat his prediction, but…
[flagged]
> "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law." Yes that's true ...and totally irrelevant. Trump is NOT drawing money from the treasury. He is performing the executive…
[flagged]
[flagged]
> This isn't in the presidential powers. Yes it is! It is literally the first sentence of section 1 of Article II of the constitution! Saying, "I don't like this therefore it's not in his power" is logically identical…
> unlimited access to classified government computer systems. What makes you think they have access to classified government computer systems, let alone unlimited access? It's my understanding that classified data is on…