Apparently, intelligence is to deliberately misunderstand the point being made
The linked documentation in the first paragraph is confusing. It sets things in `context`, then calls `supertramp()`, which doesn't even use `context.user_index` or `my_custom_allocator()` specifically, which is not…
For those of us not up to date with the state of the art, can you provide references? Very interested!
Perhaps someone has a system that evolves bots by mutation, and these patterns are just the effects of 'bad' mutations. I'm not serious either, though.
As someone interested in compiler technology, I was happy to see a simple example of a tracing JIT in LLVM. See: http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3851
Just because something is turing complete doesn't mean it is also effective at managing complexity to whatever degree. Any computation that can be expressed in Python can be equivalently expressed in Brainfuck, but one…
Apparently, intelligence is to deliberately misunderstand the point being made
The linked documentation in the first paragraph is confusing. It sets things in `context`, then calls `supertramp()`, which doesn't even use `context.user_index` or `my_custom_allocator()` specifically, which is not…
For those of us not up to date with the state of the art, can you provide references? Very interested!
Perhaps someone has a system that evolves bots by mutation, and these patterns are just the effects of 'bad' mutations. I'm not serious either, though.
As someone interested in compiler technology, I was happy to see a simple example of a tracing JIT in LLVM. See: http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3851
Just because something is turing complete doesn't mean it is also effective at managing complexity to whatever degree. Any computation that can be expressed in Python can be equivalently expressed in Brainfuck, but one…