Equality of opportunity is a misleading term. 'Equality of process' I've found, is far better. I believe there is equality of process, but, there are immutable biological facts that result in the difference.
Undeniable without hard evidence?
Facts don't trust poor people with 'free' money.
>In the case of a political election, the losing minority does not have their property instantly and compulsorily purchased at an arbitrary price set by the winner. Perhaps not instantly, but it that's exactly what…
Or, they're investing precisely because they will.
This is what actually happens: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irwin_Schiff
How is tax policy enforced? (Hint: force, not peace)
If you truly believe that -- move to Venezuela.
Government price controls do not fundamentally change the cost only the price. If the government is so efficient and can, somehow, make housing cheaper than it would be in a free market why shouldn't they also take…
That's still immoral. If you're worried about the public good, there are nonviolent and consensual means of cooperation that I believe would make all of us far more prosperous than today.
Let alone a 'science'.
Anyone who down votes, happy to be proved wrong. Very simple test: don't pay and see what happens.
There's no moral superiority when you're relying on the use of force to acquire funds. (i.e. theft)
Essentially not thinking beyond stage one. (The self destruction of a welfare state and open borders, to use the immigration example)
If you are truly worried about power, look no further than the government. The power to use force is actual power.
You do not attract high quality staff by offering $0 salary. Nor do you get high quality staff when they cannot be fired(as is so common today).
> (which isn't even a quality commanded to a significant degree by genetics) Evidence?
Seems like your problem is with the legal system, not Thiel. Which is completely fair. "Don't hate the player, hate the game."
> someone secretly using money to manipulate a case in which he is not a direct participant. What manipulation was there? 3rd parties funding lawsuits is not a new, it's been happening for centuries.
The 0.1% can fund a lawsuit because you published a sex tape. >We're now officially owned by the 300! That's a steep slope.
Equality of opportunity is a misleading term. 'Equality of process' I've found, is far better. I believe there is equality of process, but, there are immutable biological facts that result in the difference.
Undeniable without hard evidence?
Facts don't trust poor people with 'free' money.
>In the case of a political election, the losing minority does not have their property instantly and compulsorily purchased at an arbitrary price set by the winner. Perhaps not instantly, but it that's exactly what…
Or, they're investing precisely because they will.
This is what actually happens: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irwin_Schiff
How is tax policy enforced? (Hint: force, not peace)
If you truly believe that -- move to Venezuela.
Government price controls do not fundamentally change the cost only the price. If the government is so efficient and can, somehow, make housing cheaper than it would be in a free market why shouldn't they also take…
That's still immoral. If you're worried about the public good, there are nonviolent and consensual means of cooperation that I believe would make all of us far more prosperous than today.
Let alone a 'science'.
Anyone who down votes, happy to be proved wrong. Very simple test: don't pay and see what happens.
There's no moral superiority when you're relying on the use of force to acquire funds. (i.e. theft)
Essentially not thinking beyond stage one. (The self destruction of a welfare state and open borders, to use the immigration example)
If you are truly worried about power, look no further than the government. The power to use force is actual power.
You do not attract high quality staff by offering $0 salary. Nor do you get high quality staff when they cannot be fired(as is so common today).
> (which isn't even a quality commanded to a significant degree by genetics) Evidence?
Seems like your problem is with the legal system, not Thiel. Which is completely fair. "Don't hate the player, hate the game."
> someone secretly using money to manipulate a case in which he is not a direct participant. What manipulation was there? 3rd parties funding lawsuits is not a new, it's been happening for centuries.
The 0.1% can fund a lawsuit because you published a sex tape. >We're now officially owned by the 300! That's a steep slope.