https://mastodon.social/@ttpphd
https://ttpphd.com/
If LLMs were good at summarization, this wouldn't be necessary. Turns out a stochastic model of language is not a summary in the way humans think of summaries. Thus all this extra faff.
You didn't believe it then, but you better believe it now: RegEx is the final boss of both code and science.
Exactly. Why is my browser serving me advertising in the first place? Because Mozilla is an advertising company now.
This is just denialism.
It's amazing that no one really cares. Would you have believed that two years ago?
This isn't what I meant but thanks anyway.
This is where my thoughts went too. I see no reason to speculate about this in the absence of clear and persuasive comparison examples with other fine tuning content.
This is wrong and naive. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/doge-dives-into-core-na... "DOGE currently has far deeper and far more extensive access to U.S. government computer systems — and is far deeper into the…
Are you a scientist?
No
It's almost like scientists are doing something more than a random search over language.
Witness the pure arrogance of tech bros
You didn't make a case for any of that. No one did. This whole discussion is just a bunch of people who have their feelings hurt when other people tell them a LLM is modeling language, not reasoning. It's so…
It's absolutely not taboo to believe that. It's a very common belief. Lot of game playing going on here to center on a victim narrative.
"societal taboos and power structures can be revealed by noting what speech provokes the strongest reactions" Ok I'll bite. Who is the marginalized Other?
Throwing your hands up in the air like this doesn't help build a constructive case for using the word reasoning. It builds a case that words mean whatever
"if the president does it, it's not illegal" ok Nixon.
Gullibility is a thing, which is why we demand people go through channels of accountability, including security clearances.
Yes my main takeaway from the musk flagging discussions on here is that tech people are no where near capable of taking responsibility for their central role in this mess. If I call all my sins "politics", say…
It is extremely telling that when you hear "DEI specific role" you wrongly imagint that refers to the identity of the person rather than someone who's role it is to work on issues around diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Try Semantra https://github.com/freedmand/semantra
"Team morale: +89% Conflict resolution rate: 94% Therapy costs saved: $25,000 Human managers questioning their purpose: 100%" Very serious blog content!
Have you met the undergrads at Gallaudet University? They live in both worlds.
Just is all you need.
If LLMs were good at summarization, this wouldn't be necessary. Turns out a stochastic model of language is not a summary in the way humans think of summaries. Thus all this extra faff.
You didn't believe it then, but you better believe it now: RegEx is the final boss of both code and science.
Exactly. Why is my browser serving me advertising in the first place? Because Mozilla is an advertising company now.
This is just denialism.
It's amazing that no one really cares. Would you have believed that two years ago?
This isn't what I meant but thanks anyway.
This is where my thoughts went too. I see no reason to speculate about this in the absence of clear and persuasive comparison examples with other fine tuning content.
This is wrong and naive. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/doge-dives-into-core-na... "DOGE currently has far deeper and far more extensive access to U.S. government computer systems — and is far deeper into the…
Are you a scientist?
No
It's almost like scientists are doing something more than a random search over language.
Witness the pure arrogance of tech bros
Are you a scientist?
You didn't make a case for any of that. No one did. This whole discussion is just a bunch of people who have their feelings hurt when other people tell them a LLM is modeling language, not reasoning. It's so…
It's absolutely not taboo to believe that. It's a very common belief. Lot of game playing going on here to center on a victim narrative.
"societal taboos and power structures can be revealed by noting what speech provokes the strongest reactions" Ok I'll bite. Who is the marginalized Other?
Throwing your hands up in the air like this doesn't help build a constructive case for using the word reasoning. It builds a case that words mean whatever
"if the president does it, it's not illegal" ok Nixon.
Gullibility is a thing, which is why we demand people go through channels of accountability, including security clearances.
Yes my main takeaway from the musk flagging discussions on here is that tech people are no where near capable of taking responsibility for their central role in this mess. If I call all my sins "politics", say…
It is extremely telling that when you hear "DEI specific role" you wrongly imagint that refers to the identity of the person rather than someone who's role it is to work on issues around diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Try Semantra https://github.com/freedmand/semantra
"Team morale: +89% Conflict resolution rate: 94% Therapy costs saved: $25,000 Human managers questioning their purpose: 100%" Very serious blog content!
Have you met the undergrads at Gallaudet University? They live in both worlds.
Just is all you need.