Tho best response would have probably been to ignore it, initial request was equally condescending IMHO.
Ok, maybe not remove it completely, but start tampering with it. And i quote the article: Because messages are end-to-end encrypted, to comply with the law WhatsApp says it would have break encryption for receivers, as…
You support privacy yet want to see and to end encryption removed (if the article is correct) and propose moving to a platform that in this sense is less secure from eavesdropping? OK. Besides banning WhatsApp won't…
Or it could also be that people are more often clicking on recent links or searching for "something something 2021". I know I usually give higher preference to links with more recent date attached as that…
Tho best response would have probably been to ignore it, initial request was equally condescending IMHO.
Ok, maybe not remove it completely, but start tampering with it. And i quote the article: Because messages are end-to-end encrypted, to comply with the law WhatsApp says it would have break encryption for receivers, as…
You support privacy yet want to see and to end encryption removed (if the article is correct) and propose moving to a platform that in this sense is less secure from eavesdropping? OK. Besides banning WhatsApp won't…
Or it could also be that people are more often clicking on recent links or searching for "something something 2021". I know I usually give higher preference to links with more recent date attached as that…