Is anyone genuinely surprised by this? I grew up with the early days of Facebook and everyone around understood the company must be doing _something_ to provide some service to people for free. I've accepted the fact…
I was half hoping that Intel would differentiate themselves from AMD by increasing frequency instead of playing the number-of-cores game against AMD.. Or is further push in frequency meaningless?
> Since it’s the only service directly accessible from the public Internet, we will focus on Discord Voice server failovers. Why is the Gateway not directly accessible from the public Internet?
Such an uninspiring idea that would be underdeveloped and underused.. People should focus on more important aspects in IoT (security, scalability, privacy etc) and use existing solutions with better design to achieve…
Is anyone genuinely surprised by this? I grew up with the early days of Facebook and everyone around understood the company must be doing _something_ to provide some service to people for free. I've accepted the fact…
I was half hoping that Intel would differentiate themselves from AMD by increasing frequency instead of playing the number-of-cores game against AMD.. Or is further push in frequency meaningless?
> Since it’s the only service directly accessible from the public Internet, we will focus on Discord Voice server failovers. Why is the Gateway not directly accessible from the public Internet?
Such an uninspiring idea that would be underdeveloped and underused.. People should focus on more important aspects in IoT (security, scalability, privacy etc) and use existing solutions with better design to achieve…