Yes I understand, actually I know quiet a bit about how dinosaur like RIAA/IFPI make their lives:P But as I quoted in my article, Spotify staff admitted that they got music in lossless from labels, and have the rights…
So... You are suggesting me to write this entire report based on "from what I heard, about 70% of the 100 tracks I auditioned are probably not at 320 kbps"?...
I think the ever-ongoing war between audiophiles and "nobody can tell 128/192/256/whatever kbps lossy files from CD" supporters is irreverent here. I am not suggesting Spotify to give us a better quality that maybe…
Thanks for all the comments. Personally I don't think licensing is the problem. Why would the labels let Spotify stream the new Paul Oakenfold and Beyonce album as exclusive pre-releases and, at the same time, not allow…
Yes I understand, actually I know quiet a bit about how dinosaur like RIAA/IFPI make their lives:P But as I quoted in my article, Spotify staff admitted that they got music in lossless from labels, and have the rights…
So... You are suggesting me to write this entire report based on "from what I heard, about 70% of the 100 tracks I auditioned are probably not at 320 kbps"?...
I think the ever-ongoing war between audiophiles and "nobody can tell 128/192/256/whatever kbps lossy files from CD" supporters is irreverent here. I am not suggesting Spotify to give us a better quality that maybe…
Thanks for all the comments. Personally I don't think licensing is the problem. Why would the labels let Spotify stream the new Paul Oakenfold and Beyonce album as exclusive pre-releases and, at the same time, not allow…