[flagged]
I agree that there may be a lot of variation between models that leads to different use cases, at least today. But I’m not sure the car analogy works. An X5 is not simply “inferior” to a CR-V, or vice versa. A Camry is…
Sorry that's no realistic. People start businesses, including law firms, all the time with little to no capital. Assuming token costs will be prohibitive assumes: A) tokens will be really expensive and B) you need to…
> a brain can innovate, and as of this moment, an LLM cannot because it relies on previously available information. Source needed RE brain. Define innovate, in a way that a LLM can't and we definitively can prove a…
Just wait until after launch. You get a refined experience and often much lower prices.
I pointed out the claim is both irrelevant and factually wrong. That should be sufficient rebuttal.
Humans are not deterministic. Ironically AI models are iirc. Come up with a real argument.
> Not spending all the wealth you before you die would be irrational if your children won't inherit it. Sure, but that's only one small aspect of the economy. Maybe younger generations would earn more with all the…
You've not established that your suggestions are core principles of modern economics or derived from them. For example, you are asserting there would be 'no reason to own property beyond a certain age'... which isn't…
If no sources exist, then you must accept making claims such as this would 'lower savings rates' are simply not backed up. Maybe it will... maybe it won't. So what if there is no reason to own property beyond a certain…
I'd need a source to back up those claims, as you note it's not trivial to understand how economy would react. I also don't see why buying a house would be much riskier? If you buy a house for your family it's because…
Why is spending everything before you die a perverse incentive?
Except that if rendering was magically free... why not just pathtrace everything? DLSS might not be as good as pure unlimited pathtracing, but for a given budget it might be better than rasterization alone.
> Rasterizing results in better graphics quality than DLSS if compute is not a limiting factor. Sure, but compute is a limiting factor.
In part because it's an odd compromise. With the exception of LLM's which are a decent development... there wasn't a lot of need to high memory, but moderate GPU compute parts. You'd either have a lot of memory and a…
Remember that AMD has been making x86 SoC's with unified memory for quite some time.
Sure, but the same likely applies to Oil as well right? Fossil Fuels don't magically extract and refine themselves. What analysis do you point to that suggests fossil fuels have a smaller impact than, say, wind?
> One oil well can produce an amount of free energy (24/7) that a 100 acre wind farm can only produce sporadically, assuming the well is a reasonably high volume producer. It depends on the specific well/geology. Except…
> The energy density of fossil fuels means that those side-effects would be worse with other sources of energy. Can you expand on this? How does the density of fossil fuel make them a better source of energy than say…
Lol, adding a hue is usually a crutch for a too small screen with lifted blacks... which doesn't paint the pro in a very positive light! Ironically by adding a gue to a nomral screen, you're effectively 'adding' pixels…
If you're implementing you're idea's... who is marketing them? Who is handling customer support? What about sales, legal, finance, hr etc? Writing code is not building a business.
You can do the same thing with any screen by holding it the appropriate distance. Keep in mind that all that unwatchable area is pixels that aren't being used to improve the movie image.
"The movies that play in virtual screens are native to the films’ aspect ratios, which can vary movie to movie, eliminating the black bars of “letterboxing” and “pillarboxing” you typically have on iPads, iPhones, or…
So the first business has no competition... but also no defensibility? The second business should be able to be much bigger AND easier, but you aren't focussing all your efforts on it because you're splitting your time…
[flagged]
[flagged]
I agree that there may be a lot of variation between models that leads to different use cases, at least today. But I’m not sure the car analogy works. An X5 is not simply “inferior” to a CR-V, or vice versa. A Camry is…
Sorry that's no realistic. People start businesses, including law firms, all the time with little to no capital. Assuming token costs will be prohibitive assumes: A) tokens will be really expensive and B) you need to…
> a brain can innovate, and as of this moment, an LLM cannot because it relies on previously available information. Source needed RE brain. Define innovate, in a way that a LLM can't and we definitively can prove a…
Just wait until after launch. You get a refined experience and often much lower prices.
I pointed out the claim is both irrelevant and factually wrong. That should be sufficient rebuttal.
Humans are not deterministic. Ironically AI models are iirc. Come up with a real argument.
> Not spending all the wealth you before you die would be irrational if your children won't inherit it. Sure, but that's only one small aspect of the economy. Maybe younger generations would earn more with all the…
You've not established that your suggestions are core principles of modern economics or derived from them. For example, you are asserting there would be 'no reason to own property beyond a certain age'... which isn't…
If no sources exist, then you must accept making claims such as this would 'lower savings rates' are simply not backed up. Maybe it will... maybe it won't. So what if there is no reason to own property beyond a certain…
I'd need a source to back up those claims, as you note it's not trivial to understand how economy would react. I also don't see why buying a house would be much riskier? If you buy a house for your family it's because…
Why is spending everything before you die a perverse incentive?
Except that if rendering was magically free... why not just pathtrace everything? DLSS might not be as good as pure unlimited pathtracing, but for a given budget it might be better than rasterization alone.
> Rasterizing results in better graphics quality than DLSS if compute is not a limiting factor. Sure, but compute is a limiting factor.
In part because it's an odd compromise. With the exception of LLM's which are a decent development... there wasn't a lot of need to high memory, but moderate GPU compute parts. You'd either have a lot of memory and a…
Remember that AMD has been making x86 SoC's with unified memory for quite some time.
Sure, but the same likely applies to Oil as well right? Fossil Fuels don't magically extract and refine themselves. What analysis do you point to that suggests fossil fuels have a smaller impact than, say, wind?
> One oil well can produce an amount of free energy (24/7) that a 100 acre wind farm can only produce sporadically, assuming the well is a reasonably high volume producer. It depends on the specific well/geology. Except…
> The energy density of fossil fuels means that those side-effects would be worse with other sources of energy. Can you expand on this? How does the density of fossil fuel make them a better source of energy than say…
Lol, adding a hue is usually a crutch for a too small screen with lifted blacks... which doesn't paint the pro in a very positive light! Ironically by adding a gue to a nomral screen, you're effectively 'adding' pixels…
If you're implementing you're idea's... who is marketing them? Who is handling customer support? What about sales, legal, finance, hr etc? Writing code is not building a business.
You can do the same thing with any screen by holding it the appropriate distance. Keep in mind that all that unwatchable area is pixels that aren't being used to improve the movie image.
"The movies that play in virtual screens are native to the films’ aspect ratios, which can vary movie to movie, eliminating the black bars of “letterboxing” and “pillarboxing” you typically have on iPads, iPhones, or…
So the first business has no competition... but also no defensibility? The second business should be able to be much bigger AND easier, but you aren't focussing all your efforts on it because you're splitting your time…