> When one does this it is clear that there will in fact be two documents regarding the interrogation and a separate PM explaining this. Melzer claims there is only one statement/document. From the article: "We don’t…
> Also, he seems to be wrong about "manipulation of evidence" by Swedish police: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22204121 If you trust claims of a more or less random person writing a comment on this site.
> Melzer actually gives us absolutely no reason to think that any evidence were forged, assuming one is not going to just take his word for it. If Melzer was just "some random opinions" it would be easy to dismiss. But…
> When one does this it is clear that there will in fact be two documents regarding the interrogation and a separate PM explaining this. Melzer claims there is only one statement/document. From the article: "We don’t…
> Also, he seems to be wrong about "manipulation of evidence" by Swedish police: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22204121 If you trust claims of a more or less random person writing a comment on this site.
> Melzer actually gives us absolutely no reason to think that any evidence were forged, assuming one is not going to just take his word for it. If Melzer was just "some random opinions" it would be easy to dismiss. But…