usehand
No user record in our sample, but usehand has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but usehand has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
Thankfully you only have to do those once, not every time you drive.
I never said mirrors should be replaced. Also, this conversation is about backing up and parking (read what I said). When backing up you are mostly looking backwards only, so the focal length adjustment point is moot.…
Modern cameras give a way better view of what's behind and to the side of the car than you can ever achieve through mirrors. There's really no comparison. Yes, if you're comparing to older, inferior camera systems…
Sometimes you want to be cooler sometimes the other way? Sometimes you want cool wind blowing in your face, sometimes you don't? Is it really that hard to grasp? lol Also different people use the same car at different…
Cameras are infinitely more useful for backing up and parking. Not being able to use them is actually a skill issue.
And that's the reason I won't. You can see yourself how insanely easy it is to find this info (you replied with one you probably found pretty quickly yourself), and yet these people who are full of quickly-formed…
Besides the overall lack of information in these, they were also found to be lying in them
Uncritically posting lies from the accused party
He's not doing any favors to a case that was essentially lost and dead by bringing tons of attention to it to the point where there's a chance it might actually see a positive outcome, plus a good amount of cash via…
Quantum physics guarantees us anything is a possibility. The question is, is it a likely one at all? And the overwhelmingly likely reasons are obvious to anyone with half a brain, given all the surrounding context here.
Well, yes, if someone doesn't care to look for the full story then there will be holes almost by definition. The common accepted meaning of "holes in a story" is not "I don't know the facts", but "the story itself is…
So they chose to lose a case on merits related to the other case instead of making statements that would help (if they are in the right)?
Yep, I meant rational in the purely self-interested sense
> False. I said that a 3rd party traveling across the country to serve papers himself and then sitting in front of the house while police are called 4 times is needless YouTube drama. Notice how you ignore the second…
There aren't obvious holes. Most or all of what's been claimed as holes have just been straight up lies from B&M
Nah, the whole Guinness thing was obviously just a bit for the video. Clearly the franchise would not fall for that, when you can easily check that you were summoned to small claims (and they also probably get some form…
So why are you lying to defend them?
They havent seen any of that! It is so hard to find... No one has time for that when large corp must be defended.
Sure, it's possible the serving was not done correctly. Even in that case, this does not imply, as you have claimed, that this is "just needless YouTube drama" (emphasis mine). There is clearly a lot going on beyond the…
You go around claiming the accusations are "just needless YouTube drama" and that you "wouldn't really trust the YouTube influencers for the whole story". If you think this is not defending the company, then you have…
> I'm not defending the company at all. My comment was about the YouTuber who got involved as a 3rd party for content production. You have claimed the story is "just needless YouTube drama" and that you "wouldn't really…
[flagged]
In this thread you have admitted to not knowing basic facts about this case. Yet here you are pontificating on the merits. Are you affiliated with B&M? Maybe an employee or franchisee? Why do you feel so strongly you…
Watch part two and you will understand the claims of "the police are in on it". I agree it sounded like a joke in part 1, but after you see the rest of the story it makes sense.
I don't know what point you're trying to make. But also please watch the video, they submitted multiple separate claims via different aggrieved parties, this totaled $100k, despite the low individual small claims maxima.