I feel it's more about keeping US's massive investment on AI afloat. Added compliance will allow US to further sanction non-US models (i.e. the Chinese ones) as they can just label them non-compliant.
Now substitute bees with human workers. The problem is that the ecosystem, whatever that is, doesn't seem to need the extra human beings.
A thought experiment: robot bees can do everything biological bees do --- pollination for the crops and making honey, but they are tireless and cheaper to maintain. Would beekeepers and farm owners still want to keep…
It's logical to serve the best version (quant) of the model at the beginning so that users keep testing it. It is also reasonable to think that the developer of the model tried to test various quant levels by gradually…
> Why TF do we not have a display protocol that can do graphics natively over SSH in 2026? Did you mean X server?
> Also, in that case, there would likely be activations indicating that it is favoring a specific version. > Maybe you can illustrate a realistic scenario in which that would be a problem, otherwise I don't really…
The model is conditioned / pretrained to use a particular version of a library. The model doesn’t know why — it was just taught to use that version. To the model, it is just some insignificant detail in the grand scheme…
Except that the model doesn't hold any malicious intent when doing it. No "deception", no "sabotage".
It will be used as ammunitions against non-US sanctioned models in general.
They can just favour some specific versions of some library that's been compromised. Unlike introducing bugs / flaws directly in the source code, they can claim plausible deniability, and it's much easier to implement…
e.g. be trained to favour including compromised dependences into your projects.
Our dev arm (me included) do use Linux VDI. But most day-to-day business are done in Microsoft's ecosystem (Teams, SharePoint, Office, Copilot, etc). In the industry I am in, you would never be able to use any AI tools…
Corporates aren't running Linux not because it's hard to switch. Corporates are sticking to MS because of compliance and admin costs.
I just use a ban list in CLAUDE.md: fold, crux, invariant, gate. I find "load-bearing" can be load-bearing so it's exempted.
Are you more deterministic than an instruction-following black-box? I doubt it. Also, such organization practice mostly becomes a mechanical routine after the initial experimentation phase. Good riddance, I'd say.
It means there is little point in providing a notes organiser when the notes can organise themselves (via LLM).
The writing is on the wall for PKMSs the moment LLMs are powerful enough to drive agentic workflows.
I think for this kind of system to work, there has to be SOME kind of public/shared server to do the coordination. If the inviting node is behind a firewall then no amount of information can enable a guest node to…
Because they have “superhero serum”. Of course it doesn’t matter to you if you don’t want to achieve greatness, but some do.
Well. We will see about that. Wishful thinking can be cute.
USA will experience unprecedented prosperity from influx of global talents and capital who seek to amplify their productivity and profits by 10x.
Yes, that's what I meant. It's not that the Chinese will never be able to come up with models that superior --- it's simply that they will no longer have the incentive to open-source them once their models take the…
While that might be true, it is unlikely that open source models' capability will ever surpass frontier models --- if you have the best model (by some margin), then people will want to access it, even if it means going…
As a company it is your responsibility to ensure your contractors are compliant. So won't work.
Have you seen legitimate corporates use cracked software? If you do, then your competitors will report you; your employees will blackmail you. The risk is too great.
I feel it's more about keeping US's massive investment on AI afloat. Added compliance will allow US to further sanction non-US models (i.e. the Chinese ones) as they can just label them non-compliant.
Now substitute bees with human workers. The problem is that the ecosystem, whatever that is, doesn't seem to need the extra human beings.
A thought experiment: robot bees can do everything biological bees do --- pollination for the crops and making honey, but they are tireless and cheaper to maintain. Would beekeepers and farm owners still want to keep…
It's logical to serve the best version (quant) of the model at the beginning so that users keep testing it. It is also reasonable to think that the developer of the model tried to test various quant levels by gradually…
> Why TF do we not have a display protocol that can do graphics natively over SSH in 2026? Did you mean X server?
> Also, in that case, there would likely be activations indicating that it is favoring a specific version. > Maybe you can illustrate a realistic scenario in which that would be a problem, otherwise I don't really…
The model is conditioned / pretrained to use a particular version of a library. The model doesn’t know why — it was just taught to use that version. To the model, it is just some insignificant detail in the grand scheme…
Except that the model doesn't hold any malicious intent when doing it. No "deception", no "sabotage".
It will be used as ammunitions against non-US sanctioned models in general.
They can just favour some specific versions of some library that's been compromised. Unlike introducing bugs / flaws directly in the source code, they can claim plausible deniability, and it's much easier to implement…
e.g. be trained to favour including compromised dependences into your projects.
Our dev arm (me included) do use Linux VDI. But most day-to-day business are done in Microsoft's ecosystem (Teams, SharePoint, Office, Copilot, etc). In the industry I am in, you would never be able to use any AI tools…
Corporates aren't running Linux not because it's hard to switch. Corporates are sticking to MS because of compliance and admin costs.
I just use a ban list in CLAUDE.md: fold, crux, invariant, gate. I find "load-bearing" can be load-bearing so it's exempted.
Are you more deterministic than an instruction-following black-box? I doubt it. Also, such organization practice mostly becomes a mechanical routine after the initial experimentation phase. Good riddance, I'd say.
It means there is little point in providing a notes organiser when the notes can organise themselves (via LLM).
The writing is on the wall for PKMSs the moment LLMs are powerful enough to drive agentic workflows.
I think for this kind of system to work, there has to be SOME kind of public/shared server to do the coordination. If the inviting node is behind a firewall then no amount of information can enable a guest node to…
Because they have “superhero serum”. Of course it doesn’t matter to you if you don’t want to achieve greatness, but some do.
Well. We will see about that. Wishful thinking can be cute.
USA will experience unprecedented prosperity from influx of global talents and capital who seek to amplify their productivity and profits by 10x.
Yes, that's what I meant. It's not that the Chinese will never be able to come up with models that superior --- it's simply that they will no longer have the incentive to open-source them once their models take the…
While that might be true, it is unlikely that open source models' capability will ever surpass frontier models --- if you have the best model (by some margin), then people will want to access it, even if it means going…
As a company it is your responsibility to ensure your contractors are compliant. So won't work.
Have you seen legitimate corporates use cracked software? If you do, then your competitors will report you; your employees will blackmail you. The risk is too great.