> The vaccines are not experimental Then why can’t I sue should I have an adverse effect?
The propaganda machine has been lambasting anyone showing skepticism. It’s the lab leak theory all over again.
Again, I’ll be altruistic once I have recourse. Why must I waive my legal rights?
What is more moral: - Asking the tiny fraction of the population who are immunocompromised to remain locked down until the safety of vaccines has been empirically verified? - Or asking healthy humans to take an…
99.97% survival rate for our demographic. When we can sue should we suffer an adverse reaction, then the cost-benefit analysis may even out. Right now, it’s all but downside.
> The vaccines are not experimental Then why can’t I sue should I have an adverse effect?
The propaganda machine has been lambasting anyone showing skepticism. It’s the lab leak theory all over again.
Again, I’ll be altruistic once I have recourse. Why must I waive my legal rights?
What is more moral: - Asking the tiny fraction of the population who are immunocompromised to remain locked down until the safety of vaccines has been empirically verified? - Or asking healthy humans to take an…
99.97% survival rate for our demographic. When we can sue should we suffer an adverse reaction, then the cost-benefit analysis may even out. Right now, it’s all but downside.