> Should infecting others with a flu also be considered violence? How is it not violence to infect others with a serious disease? It causes bodily harm. It is assault to knowingly expose others to a communicable…
I suppose you also think Typhoid Mary got a raw deal? What on earth makes you think your personal freedom is more important than the health of others? You have no right to harm others.
> Should infecting others with a flu also be considered violence? How is it not violence to infect others with a serious disease? It causes bodily harm. It is assault to knowingly expose others to a communicable…
I suppose you also think Typhoid Mary got a raw deal? What on earth makes you think your personal freedom is more important than the health of others? You have no right to harm others.