visualblind
No user record in our sample, but visualblind has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but visualblind has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
Looks like the site is down. Appears to be a VPS on Ghandi's platform.
> Using an expensive GPU block (with most of its cores idling) to encode slightly faster than a cheaper CPU core will do? Slightly faster? Sir, I do think you are mistaken. There are other variables go that into it such…
The major companies are such as nvidia Cuda (nvenc encoder/nvdec decoder) and VAAPI in Intel CPUs. FFmpeg has lot of good documentation on this subject.
I agree with your statement mostly. However I think if we're dealing with 1080p displays, hardware-accelerated transcoding produces acceptable video quality for non-4k+ watching. That's just my 2 cents.
Video codec transcoding is very CPU resource expensive. If you do a lot of it, you should be looking into doing hardware-accelerated transcoding. https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/HWAccelIntro My ffmpeg…