This opens up a whole new world of possibilities. Producing a custom fine-tuned model from a prompt...
You can be bullish on LLMs profoundly transforming society while being bearish on the economy "digesting" this new technology fast enough to justify the incredible capital spending necessary to power it.
You bring up some interesting points. I certainly think that you can go overboard in the other direction, like in South Korea, where I'm not sure the crazy intensity of their educational system is necessarily better. I…
Oh yeah for sure, but I think that's the case "in spite of" the trajectory of the educational system. From my personal experience, people who are successful usually come from highly educated and/or wealthy families. I…
I assume because they had not adopted the "dumb everything down to reduce variance in outcomes" educational ideology that has taken hold in most of the west over the past 50 years.
I interpreted the parent as claiming that redistributing wealth would see the software industry's product offering driven by the "working class" rather than decided by the CEOs of corporations. I don't disagree that it…
All of the examples in the article are products from startups or corporations, though. I fail to see how more wealth redistribution would improve product quality.
I think this is an uncharitable take on PG's tweet. I interpret it as acknowledging the limits of AI. I think the more interesting conversation is : why are AI's outputs still so "sloppy", whether we're talking about…
I'd be curious to know how the "weights are conscious" crowd interpret this model!
But wouldn't that be horribly inefficient? Instead of executing code by transforming it into a set of weights and running inference on them, wouldn't it be easier to just execute code as... code?
It's been one of the most eye-opening things for me as well. People who I considered serious and intelligent completely falling prey to "no need to read the code" AI psychosis. Perhaps it reveals something deeper about…
This opens up a whole new world of possibilities. Producing a custom fine-tuned model from a prompt...
You can be bullish on LLMs profoundly transforming society while being bearish on the economy "digesting" this new technology fast enough to justify the incredible capital spending necessary to power it.
You bring up some interesting points. I certainly think that you can go overboard in the other direction, like in South Korea, where I'm not sure the crazy intensity of their educational system is necessarily better. I…
Oh yeah for sure, but I think that's the case "in spite of" the trajectory of the educational system. From my personal experience, people who are successful usually come from highly educated and/or wealthy families. I…
I assume because they had not adopted the "dumb everything down to reduce variance in outcomes" educational ideology that has taken hold in most of the west over the past 50 years.
I interpreted the parent as claiming that redistributing wealth would see the software industry's product offering driven by the "working class" rather than decided by the CEOs of corporations. I don't disagree that it…
All of the examples in the article are products from startups or corporations, though. I fail to see how more wealth redistribution would improve product quality.
I think this is an uncharitable take on PG's tweet. I interpret it as acknowledging the limits of AI. I think the more interesting conversation is : why are AI's outputs still so "sloppy", whether we're talking about…
I'd be curious to know how the "weights are conscious" crowd interpret this model!
But wouldn't that be horribly inefficient? Instead of executing code by transforming it into a set of weights and running inference on them, wouldn't it be easier to just execute code as... code?
It's been one of the most eye-opening things for me as well. People who I considered serious and intelligent completely falling prey to "no need to read the code" AI psychosis. Perhaps it reveals something deeper about…