shift-insert works in X if you can't middle click. In gvim too, out-of-the-box if you're in insert mode.
The point is its still http. Think of TOR as acting like a VPN or point-to-point tunnel. You can conceptually think of it as another network interface plugged into your network. The policy you choose what to route over…
Probably even easier to just show pictures in pairs and have the participant to select the one they think is more attractive.
ITts a lot better. I've ported libdbus-1 code to sd-bus and in practise I saw 100s of lines are replaced by about 20, with better error reporting on top of it.
What about files with newlines? evil smirk
The core difference is that: - `[` is treated as a statement - `[[` is treated as an expression Which, for example, is why you can't use `>` in `[` based expressions. Bash thinks you want to redirect the output of `[`…
Ironically, if the given example was written in pure bash, it would be violating best practices. You don't parse ls line-by-line because you can't make the assumption that filenames will map to lines. Taking this…
For what its worth, it is only MSVC without support. gcc compiler extensions are otherwise still rather portable. To clang and icc at least.
As far as I know, using `new` or not has nothing to really do if it goes onto the stack or not. That's simply a common implementation details. What its really saying is if the lifetime is automatic or manual. Maybe I'm…
> But if you tried to give me a C++ with using blocks but no RAII (read: you gave me C) If you don't care about MSVC, IMHO new C code should be using the gcc cleanup extension:…
Well the core of the issue here is you can't really staticly link against a library that depends on dlopen/dlsym (nss system is built around this). I mean, you could, but now your staticly linked binary still depends on…
shift-insert works in X if you can't middle click. In gvim too, out-of-the-box if you're in insert mode.
The point is its still http. Think of TOR as acting like a VPN or point-to-point tunnel. You can conceptually think of it as another network interface plugged into your network. The policy you choose what to route over…
Probably even easier to just show pictures in pairs and have the participant to select the one they think is more attractive.
ITts a lot better. I've ported libdbus-1 code to sd-bus and in practise I saw 100s of lines are replaced by about 20, with better error reporting on top of it.
What about files with newlines? evil smirk
The core difference is that: - `[` is treated as a statement - `[[` is treated as an expression Which, for example, is why you can't use `>` in `[` based expressions. Bash thinks you want to redirect the output of `[`…
Ironically, if the given example was written in pure bash, it would be violating best practices. You don't parse ls line-by-line because you can't make the assumption that filenames will map to lines. Taking this…
For what its worth, it is only MSVC without support. gcc compiler extensions are otherwise still rather portable. To clang and icc at least.
As far as I know, using `new` or not has nothing to really do if it goes onto the stack or not. That's simply a common implementation details. What its really saying is if the lifetime is automatic or manual. Maybe I'm…
> But if you tried to give me a C++ with using blocks but no RAII (read: you gave me C) If you don't care about MSVC, IMHO new C code should be using the gcc cleanup extension:…
Well the core of the issue here is you can't really staticly link against a library that depends on dlopen/dlsym (nss system is built around this). I mean, you could, but now your staticly linked binary still depends on…