Used in what way though. Obviously using them to do your homework and doing nothing on your own will hurt your learning.
And yet the best humans could not use that same available data to solve the problems.
>a majority of people here go "huh i guess so" Feels more like a majority goes "just unplug it hurr durr"
You cynical losers are going to get us all killed. This shit is incredibly serious.
More and more complex and dangerous tasks every day.
>You cannot risk companies like Anthropic, OpenAI or their business partners like Microsoft having unfettered access to proprietary data on your company/businesses. You do realize that businesses that have contracts…
Theres a reason those same mathematicians did not solve the problem on their own. Minimizing the impact the model made here seems unjustified.
If this were the case the problem would not have remained unsolved for this long. A new spell checker is not what cracked the problem.
This doesn't follow for me. There are what, Dozens or Erdos tier problems that got solved with no progress for decades? How does that factor in to your view?
You are wrong. A teenager with enough GPUs could never dream of making a nuke but they are absolutely able to run capable AIs in their moms basement. Totally different class of danger
>People claiming dangers and risk are just pretending or posturing. I believe you are mentally ill. >There's no more tangible risk than nuclear weapons, which we handled Lol way to rewrite history. Nuclear armageddon is…
[flagged]
Then why are we arguing? I agree with you, I'm highlighting the fact that people making light of the technology is dangerous
You have blinders on. AI is becoming more dangerous by the day.
I don't think they were joking.
Your dismissive attitude towards the most significant piece of technology invented in a generation is childish.
Honestly I find these cavalier statements to be in incredibly poor taste. Unless you are completely blind it's obvious that AI is the most significant piece of technology invented since the Atomic Bomb and could very…
The economy is already largely propped up by spending from the wealthiest decile.
>(SOMEHOW! I guess we forgot about Sora already) Yes if theres one thing we know about Chips and AI its that the price of equivalent performance literally never decreases...
I think he's literally conceding your point by writing this essay. That there will be massive upheaval and yes maybe pitchforks if we don't get ahead of the problems.
Only a P-zombie would say this.
Yes thats exactly what a P-zombie would say.
I think these people may literally be P zombies.
Jevons Paradox says no. Even more "efficient" models will increase overall GPU demand and be good for NVIDIA.
"If you don't understand that the AI driven memory boom has totally broken the cycle you are going to lose a lot of money."
Used in what way though. Obviously using them to do your homework and doing nothing on your own will hurt your learning.
And yet the best humans could not use that same available data to solve the problems.
>a majority of people here go "huh i guess so" Feels more like a majority goes "just unplug it hurr durr"
You cynical losers are going to get us all killed. This shit is incredibly serious.
More and more complex and dangerous tasks every day.
>You cannot risk companies like Anthropic, OpenAI or their business partners like Microsoft having unfettered access to proprietary data on your company/businesses. You do realize that businesses that have contracts…
Theres a reason those same mathematicians did not solve the problem on their own. Minimizing the impact the model made here seems unjustified.
If this were the case the problem would not have remained unsolved for this long. A new spell checker is not what cracked the problem.
This doesn't follow for me. There are what, Dozens or Erdos tier problems that got solved with no progress for decades? How does that factor in to your view?
You are wrong. A teenager with enough GPUs could never dream of making a nuke but they are absolutely able to run capable AIs in their moms basement. Totally different class of danger
>People claiming dangers and risk are just pretending or posturing. I believe you are mentally ill. >There's no more tangible risk than nuclear weapons, which we handled Lol way to rewrite history. Nuclear armageddon is…
[flagged]
Then why are we arguing? I agree with you, I'm highlighting the fact that people making light of the technology is dangerous
You have blinders on. AI is becoming more dangerous by the day.
I don't think they were joking.
Your dismissive attitude towards the most significant piece of technology invented in a generation is childish.
Honestly I find these cavalier statements to be in incredibly poor taste. Unless you are completely blind it's obvious that AI is the most significant piece of technology invented since the Atomic Bomb and could very…
The economy is already largely propped up by spending from the wealthiest decile.
>(SOMEHOW! I guess we forgot about Sora already) Yes if theres one thing we know about Chips and AI its that the price of equivalent performance literally never decreases...
I think he's literally conceding your point by writing this essay. That there will be massive upheaval and yes maybe pitchforks if we don't get ahead of the problems.
Only a P-zombie would say this.
Yes thats exactly what a P-zombie would say.
I think these people may literally be P zombies.
Jevons Paradox says no. Even more "efficient" models will increase overall GPU demand and be good for NVIDIA.
"If you don't understand that the AI driven memory boom has totally broken the cycle you are going to lose a lot of money."