> The Protocol > The system is intentionally raw. No headers, no JSON, no XML. > Transport: UDP Port 7777 > Encoding: UTF-8 Plain Text > Format: [SECRET::]MESSAGE you dont get it, the protocol is flawless
i suppose that links back to the other comment i made - is hype the root issue you are trying to get at? would be interesting to see what examples there are of this in recent history
worse for the consumer or the provider? if the llm is going to fundamentally do a "worse" job no matter what the incentive (whatever that is, maximising profit, maximising claims, whatever that may be) we will end up…
> What's scary isn't that these models are so good they'll replace us, but that despite how limited they are, someone will make the decision to replace humans anyway. is this a real threat? if a system/company decides…
thanks
that would be cool, but wouldn't something simpler like electrolysis of water into hydrogen/oxygen work much better? I haven't the effort to do the math, but it would require less steps, less complexity, and less…
C3H8 + 5O2 => 3CO2 + 4H20 reminder that propane burns into CO2 - this process doesn't actually unlock any new energy source, it merely just reverses a reaction that has already taken place (presumably with electricity…
chromebooks can boot from other sources in developer mode, pressing ctrl + u on startup brings up a generic SeaBIOS when certain flags are enabled from crosh
A lot of the comments seem to repeat the "just like how GPT is using our content we created" sort of reasoning - whether that you agree with that or not, I don't see how that justifies the bill for your usage being out…
> The Protocol > The system is intentionally raw. No headers, no JSON, no XML. > Transport: UDP Port 7777 > Encoding: UTF-8 Plain Text > Format: [SECRET::]MESSAGE you dont get it, the protocol is flawless
i suppose that links back to the other comment i made - is hype the root issue you are trying to get at? would be interesting to see what examples there are of this in recent history
worse for the consumer or the provider? if the llm is going to fundamentally do a "worse" job no matter what the incentive (whatever that is, maximising profit, maximising claims, whatever that may be) we will end up…
> What's scary isn't that these models are so good they'll replace us, but that despite how limited they are, someone will make the decision to replace humans anyway. is this a real threat? if a system/company decides…
thanks
that would be cool, but wouldn't something simpler like electrolysis of water into hydrogen/oxygen work much better? I haven't the effort to do the math, but it would require less steps, less complexity, and less…
C3H8 + 5O2 => 3CO2 + 4H20 reminder that propane burns into CO2 - this process doesn't actually unlock any new energy source, it merely just reverses a reaction that has already taken place (presumably with electricity…
chromebooks can boot from other sources in developer mode, pressing ctrl + u on startup brings up a generic SeaBIOS when certain flags are enabled from crosh
A lot of the comments seem to repeat the "just like how GPT is using our content we created" sort of reasoning - whether that you agree with that or not, I don't see how that justifies the bill for your usage being out…