That is not acceptable.
How does Google "own" this "market"?
Any gTLD whatsoever owned by some for profit corporation is not acceptable.
Why should any TLDs at all, like .dev and .app, be owned by Google?
> domain extensions like .dev and .app are owned by Google Why are domain extensions like .dev and .app owned by Google?
Why do you think people without passports (or uncomfortable uploading government documents to nearly every website they wish to use) should not be allowed to use those websites.
> Most people satisfy the "two forms of identification" requirement 53% of US adult citizens have a passport as of 11/22. Most of them have a state ID as well. So yes, a bare majority of citizens will be allowed…
"Man's got a point. Two is no good. Let's make it three photo ids." - Texas Legislator Tex "Hole up there son, we don't want to have to revisit this every year to patch holes. Let's put in a safety margin: Five photo…
> This might not only be about protecting the children. When you have verified name and address of every user you can charge a lot more for ads.
Uh oh. Is it that obvious?
I like to roll this way! (Just not at work.) SELECT employee_name , company_name , salary , state_code , city FROM 'employees';
You're right, they acquired Mojang and its transferable assets. But those assets don't include the implied license since there is no contract saying it is a transferable license.
> he implicitly assigned a transferable non-exclusive license to Mojang This is almost correct. If this was decided in the US, his discussions and acceptance of payment gave Mojang a non-transferable license. During the…
In the US for copyright to transfer he'd need to be an employee and writing part of his work duties, in which case it is work for hire, or if he is a contractor they'd need a signed contract saying the contractor was…
US to follow in some way, not hijabs, but some other issue.
That is not acceptable.
How does Google "own" this "market"?
Any gTLD whatsoever owned by some for profit corporation is not acceptable.
Why should any TLDs at all, like .dev and .app, be owned by Google?
> domain extensions like .dev and .app are owned by Google Why are domain extensions like .dev and .app owned by Google?
Why do you think people without passports (or uncomfortable uploading government documents to nearly every website they wish to use) should not be allowed to use those websites.
> Most people satisfy the "two forms of identification" requirement 53% of US adult citizens have a passport as of 11/22. Most of them have a state ID as well. So yes, a bare majority of citizens will be allowed…
"Man's got a point. Two is no good. Let's make it three photo ids." - Texas Legislator Tex "Hole up there son, we don't want to have to revisit this every year to patch holes. Let's put in a safety margin: Five photo…
> This might not only be about protecting the children. When you have verified name and address of every user you can charge a lot more for ads.
Uh oh. Is it that obvious?
I like to roll this way! (Just not at work.) SELECT employee_name , company_name , salary , state_code , city FROM 'employees';
You're right, they acquired Mojang and its transferable assets. But those assets don't include the implied license since there is no contract saying it is a transferable license.
> he implicitly assigned a transferable non-exclusive license to Mojang This is almost correct. If this was decided in the US, his discussions and acceptance of payment gave Mojang a non-transferable license. During the…
In the US for copyright to transfer he'd need to be an employee and writing part of his work duties, in which case it is work for hire, or if he is a contractor they'd need a signed contract saying the contractor was…
US to follow in some way, not hijabs, but some other issue.