If the new resultant particle(s) don't decay immediately near the collision why wouldn't their missing energy be evident?
The buble project wouldn't exist if babel ran faster and worked out of the box without setting up confusing config files. It fills a need.
> In the past, physicists assumed that new particles produced in particle collisions would decay immediately, almost precisely at their points of origin. But wouldn't missing energy be evident?
Install a 10 foot thick lead shield at the end of the detector and glue a $10 motion detector light to it. Problem solved. You're welcome, CERN.
I use buble. It transpiles ES6 to ES5 2.5 times faster than babel on average. But be aware that buble is still a work in progress and only supports a subset of ES6 features. A very usable subset, but a subset…
If the new resultant particle(s) don't decay immediately near the collision why wouldn't their missing energy be evident?
The buble project wouldn't exist if babel ran faster and worked out of the box without setting up confusing config files. It fills a need.
> In the past, physicists assumed that new particles produced in particle collisions would decay immediately, almost precisely at their points of origin. But wouldn't missing energy be evident?
Install a 10 foot thick lead shield at the end of the detector and glue a $10 motion detector light to it. Problem solved. You're welcome, CERN.
I use buble. It transpiles ES6 to ES5 2.5 times faster than babel on average. But be aware that buble is still a work in progress and only supports a subset of ES6 features. A very usable subset, but a subset…