Nah I don't think that's what I did. As another commenter said maybe that's how it came out (sorry), but not the intention.
> Take a step back and ask why - intention and tone are two different things, and if you get the latter wrong then we will misunderstand the former. Good point, OK.
> you know better than them what they’ve done wrong Hardly, since I just agreed with what they said. I suggested what IMHO is a good way to make up for it. Nothing else. > that you have to tell them Sure, I have to. I…
I am not assuming anything. I made a suggestion, nothing else. They're free to do nothing if they feel like they already did enough. You're assuming I'm assuming <...>, which goes against the HN rule to assume best…
I don't see anything patronizing or showing superiority in what I wrote. I am saying this as a peer, not as a superior. It's kinda weird to expect people not to make mistakes such as this if nobody tells them it's…
My free funds are currently 100% dedicated to helping Ukraine and will be until Russia falls back to 1991 borders.
Nah, I'm really not the kind of person that says nothing to this.
Was I supposed to say "great job" to this? Lol.
If an app is popular only with terrorists and child rapists, it's a weird choice for a business.
Of course... If you send someone unencrypted data, they can read it. Companies at least have to follow some laws regarding the data - don't expect that with private instances (not controlled by you).
Eh... Was it really that hard to guess what they're gonna do with it? How long ago was that? It's not like their abuse of [foreign] workers is anything new.
What kind of company gets an app popular with drug dealers for their internal communication?
In the US there are also authorities making sure (especially medical) machines are in good order. Perhaps the investors trusted the authorities?
> Investors losing their skin? That's all risk/reward. They took big risk for big reward but lost. No, it's not OK and it's not all risk/reward. The risk is whether the product can succeed and be better than others'…
Many electrical outlets now have USB ports... And now it's supposed to be USB-C... And then something else - it's going to be just as hard.
The alternating left-to-right right-to-left lines were done because you could read it easier that way - they used to have gigantic books/scrolls, the lines were very long.
It does matter, the risk calculation gets way worse once you start counting in the possibility of fraud. It's going to be 9/10 if each one of the 10 actually try their hardest to succeed. It's going to be 10/10 if fraud…
> Even in case of "corpo disallows it" (for whatever idiotic reason) it can be turned off one way or another in OS... Corpo can disallow that too via central policies
> This is possibly the biggest financial crisis in the history of everything. Isn't that a huge hyperbole? I really don't see how it could even remotely resemble anything at all what it was like in 2008. It's no more…
2 days - I get the BTC around noon, transfer it immediately, in the evening I get a confirmation from the recipient that they got it, and then I see them transfer it to someone the second day. Sometimes it's just 1 day.
I'm usually sending around $500-$1000 once every 2-3 months (per contractor - I work with multiple).
All of these options you listed are significantly more expensive, and some of the contractors I work with don't even have that option due to KYC requirements - these people don't have access to functioning governments,…
I pay for software engineering work done in Africa and sometimes South-East Asia.
Nah I don't think that's what I did. As another commenter said maybe that's how it came out (sorry), but not the intention.
> Take a step back and ask why - intention and tone are two different things, and if you get the latter wrong then we will misunderstand the former. Good point, OK.
> you know better than them what they’ve done wrong Hardly, since I just agreed with what they said. I suggested what IMHO is a good way to make up for it. Nothing else. > that you have to tell them Sure, I have to. I…
I am not assuming anything. I made a suggestion, nothing else. They're free to do nothing if they feel like they already did enough. You're assuming I'm assuming <...>, which goes against the HN rule to assume best…
I don't see anything patronizing or showing superiority in what I wrote. I am saying this as a peer, not as a superior. It's kinda weird to expect people not to make mistakes such as this if nobody tells them it's…
My free funds are currently 100% dedicated to helping Ukraine and will be until Russia falls back to 1991 borders.
Nah, I'm really not the kind of person that says nothing to this.
Was I supposed to say "great job" to this? Lol.
If an app is popular only with terrorists and child rapists, it's a weird choice for a business.
Of course... If you send someone unencrypted data, they can read it. Companies at least have to follow some laws regarding the data - don't expect that with private instances (not controlled by you).
Eh... Was it really that hard to guess what they're gonna do with it? How long ago was that? It's not like their abuse of [foreign] workers is anything new.
What kind of company gets an app popular with drug dealers for their internal communication?
In the US there are also authorities making sure (especially medical) machines are in good order. Perhaps the investors trusted the authorities?
> Investors losing their skin? That's all risk/reward. They took big risk for big reward but lost. No, it's not OK and it's not all risk/reward. The risk is whether the product can succeed and be better than others'…
Many electrical outlets now have USB ports... And now it's supposed to be USB-C... And then something else - it's going to be just as hard.
The alternating left-to-right right-to-left lines were done because you could read it easier that way - they used to have gigantic books/scrolls, the lines were very long.
It does matter, the risk calculation gets way worse once you start counting in the possibility of fraud. It's going to be 9/10 if each one of the 10 actually try their hardest to succeed. It's going to be 10/10 if fraud…
> Even in case of "corpo disallows it" (for whatever idiotic reason) it can be turned off one way or another in OS... Corpo can disallow that too via central policies
> This is possibly the biggest financial crisis in the history of everything. Isn't that a huge hyperbole? I really don't see how it could even remotely resemble anything at all what it was like in 2008. It's no more…
2 days - I get the BTC around noon, transfer it immediately, in the evening I get a confirmation from the recipient that they got it, and then I see them transfer it to someone the second day. Sometimes it's just 1 day.
I'm usually sending around $500-$1000 once every 2-3 months (per contractor - I work with multiple).
All of these options you listed are significantly more expensive, and some of the contractors I work with don't even have that option due to KYC requirements - these people don't have access to functioning governments,…
I pay for software engineering work done in Africa and sometimes South-East Asia.