The government represents the public will of the people and has democratic legitimacy. The notion that it should be more constrained than private actors seems absurd. I'm okay with taxation, pulling people over for…
I agree that that is not a good argument. I am perfectly fine with the government having access to things, for instance taxation or armed enforcers + bodycams, that are illegal for the youtuber.
What country?
Maybe I’m a radical but I am okay with the government having capabilities that are different from what a youtuber is allowed to do.
there is definitely some generative pixel stuff in the iOS pipeline as i've noticed garbled deepdream-esque letters when zooming before
pretty sure you can get an esim in china
which countries are esims not a thing?
it is truly not obvious to you why keyboard isn’t a good analogy for LLM?
it’s much more like you come up with the premise and someone else writes the book. the released prompts for other foundational problems (like unit distance) prove that.
frankly don’t know how to reply to these sorts of comments anymore
but the researchers were also largely relying on AI
This argument proves too much. By this standard, it wouldn't have counted as copying their approach if the researchers had just fed in Levent & Buckmaster's paper verbatim as a prompt into the swarm.
If the reason that OpenAI is unable to state whether they trained on this data is because they (as policy) do not reveal whether a given member has turned on/off the "Improve the model for everyone" setting, they can at…
I agree that it is not possible to prove if any one specific conversation (or derived RL tasks) was key to solving Navier-Stokes (at least without massive resource expenditure). I don't really understand how the…
I'm confused, your employer very directly stated that they are unable to confirm that the model was not trained on the conversations.
as the other commentator said, it's one thing if it's just variable names (opaque to reverse engineering) but the fact that it is registry keys....
i think this is an isolated demand for rigor, my way of approaching it was fine, and it is only due to the political valence of the comment i'm replying to that i got downvoted and flagged. take care
I hear what your saying, but I don't think it really applies to a question asking for the veracity of a previously stated claim, especially when the claim is actually false. I think there is more than enough bad things…
I was not making an argument, just asking for any factual basis to the parent comment. I guess that is deserving of 5 downvotes. > I think they forgot about that, thank god. All the innocent citizens we sent there are…
no, i just legitimately don't think this has happened
can you link me to any case of a US citizen being sent to El Salvador?
the meaning is pretty obvious - they want to train on your chats & tasks and are willing to subsidize for the privilege of doing so.
kimi already exists and yes it is more than possible. it's coming
Wasn't the whole point of not releasing because they wanted to normalize the process/concerns for future actually dangerous releases? I think the release of kimi k3 is definitely arguably dangerous, we're already seeing…
i have no idea who that is but also i was talking about society writ large, not just music.
The government represents the public will of the people and has democratic legitimacy. The notion that it should be more constrained than private actors seems absurd. I'm okay with taxation, pulling people over for…
I agree that that is not a good argument. I am perfectly fine with the government having access to things, for instance taxation or armed enforcers + bodycams, that are illegal for the youtuber.
What country?
Maybe I’m a radical but I am okay with the government having capabilities that are different from what a youtuber is allowed to do.
there is definitely some generative pixel stuff in the iOS pipeline as i've noticed garbled deepdream-esque letters when zooming before
pretty sure you can get an esim in china
which countries are esims not a thing?
it is truly not obvious to you why keyboard isn’t a good analogy for LLM?
it’s much more like you come up with the premise and someone else writes the book. the released prompts for other foundational problems (like unit distance) prove that.
frankly don’t know how to reply to these sorts of comments anymore
but the researchers were also largely relying on AI
This argument proves too much. By this standard, it wouldn't have counted as copying their approach if the researchers had just fed in Levent & Buckmaster's paper verbatim as a prompt into the swarm.
If the reason that OpenAI is unable to state whether they trained on this data is because they (as policy) do not reveal whether a given member has turned on/off the "Improve the model for everyone" setting, they can at…
I agree that it is not possible to prove if any one specific conversation (or derived RL tasks) was key to solving Navier-Stokes (at least without massive resource expenditure). I don't really understand how the…
I'm confused, your employer very directly stated that they are unable to confirm that the model was not trained on the conversations.
as the other commentator said, it's one thing if it's just variable names (opaque to reverse engineering) but the fact that it is registry keys....
i think this is an isolated demand for rigor, my way of approaching it was fine, and it is only due to the political valence of the comment i'm replying to that i got downvoted and flagged. take care
I hear what your saying, but I don't think it really applies to a question asking for the veracity of a previously stated claim, especially when the claim is actually false. I think there is more than enough bad things…
I was not making an argument, just asking for any factual basis to the parent comment. I guess that is deserving of 5 downvotes. > I think they forgot about that, thank god. All the innocent citizens we sent there are…
no, i just legitimately don't think this has happened
can you link me to any case of a US citizen being sent to El Salvador?
the meaning is pretty obvious - they want to train on your chats & tasks and are willing to subsidize for the privilege of doing so.
kimi already exists and yes it is more than possible. it's coming
Wasn't the whole point of not releasing because they wanted to normalize the process/concerns for future actually dangerous releases? I think the release of kimi k3 is definitely arguably dangerous, we're already seeing…
i have no idea who that is but also i was talking about society writ large, not just music.