> They don't give a shit that the recipient is rejecting legitimate mail -- they blame us for their problems. All because some asshat with a copy of TheBat! signed up and managed to send out a couple hundred…
So why is he going around abusing Spamhaus, accusing them of "nuking" his domain? His DNS provider acted stupidly, so let him go and attack them. And stop making will accusations and idiotic comparisons to SOPA. And…
They added Google Doc ip addresses to their RBL, so that SMTP traffic from those IPs would be blocked by those who chose to run Spamhaus' blacklist.
More damage than spammers? I see you've never run a mailserver. I have and I know that Spamhaus are one of the good guys doing a hard thankless job, risking lawsuits and threats, in order to keep email as a useful tool.…
I cannot ever recall seeing a more misleading and manipulative posting attempting to garner undeserved sympathy by falsely trying to associate one's case with bad legislation. This has nothing to do with SOPA, it is not…
> They don't give a shit that the recipient is rejecting legitimate mail -- they blame us for their problems. All because some asshat with a copy of TheBat! signed up and managed to send out a couple hundred…
So why is he going around abusing Spamhaus, accusing them of "nuking" his domain? His DNS provider acted stupidly, so let him go and attack them. And stop making will accusations and idiotic comparisons to SOPA. And…
They added Google Doc ip addresses to their RBL, so that SMTP traffic from those IPs would be blocked by those who chose to run Spamhaus' blacklist.
More damage than spammers? I see you've never run a mailserver. I have and I know that Spamhaus are one of the good guys doing a hard thankless job, risking lawsuits and threats, in order to keep email as a useful tool.…
I cannot ever recall seeing a more misleading and manipulative posting attempting to garner undeserved sympathy by falsely trying to associate one's case with bad legislation. This has nothing to do with SOPA, it is not…