> at this point I don’t think it makes sense to consider Sid’s intent nefarious Why not? He's spouting a bunch of ridiculous bullshit about licensing without any consensus among people who are experts in licensing and…
I read that and thought: this is ridiculous. First of all, assigning copyright to FSF or SFC is way way better protection. Also DCO has nothing to do with protecting, the protection is from "inbound = outbound"…
> The unix time is synced with UTC No, it isn't. The very article you linked explains that Unix time is monotonically increasing and ignores leap seconds.
> at this point I don’t think it makes sense to consider Sid’s intent nefarious Why not? He's spouting a bunch of ridiculous bullshit about licensing without any consensus among people who are experts in licensing and…
I read that and thought: this is ridiculous. First of all, assigning copyright to FSF or SFC is way way better protection. Also DCO has nothing to do with protecting, the protection is from "inbound = outbound"…
> The unix time is synced with UTC No, it isn't. The very article you linked explains that Unix time is monotonically increasing and ignores leap seconds.