> Dairy farmers have put enough pressure on politicians across the political spectrum How? I do remember the big protests in the 90s quite well, certainly, but that was 30-some-odd years ago and when, as we saw earlier,…
> For bulk commodities, the US subsidies are largely commodity-specific and acre-based Again, the largest component is crop insurance, which is modelled essentially the same as it is in Canada. ~60% of the premium is…
> The US subsidies tend to be more indirect, meaning that the large agri-corporations capture most of it. It's essentially the same system, with the primary subsidy being paying 60% of crop insurance premium in Canada…
> Creating a fair and level trading system around it is difficult. There are no real limitations outside of dairy, poultry, and eggs; same as on the US front. If it is so difficult why is there nothing in place, aside…
> stolen every piece of human text ever written Those who argue copyright infringement have a somewhat compelling claim, but stolen is a little out there. Especially since text I have written has provably never been…
> I've seen no nation where the will of the people is typically manifested in the actions of the state. To be fair, I've seen no nation where the people make their will known. Does a democracy depend on actual action or…
There is nothing else in the comment except the bit about it being required by law, which doesn't change anything.
Just remove anything software-related from the training dataset. Which also solves the alignment problem with those who do not enjoy seeing LLMs write software. But that brings us back to: Aligned to whom?
> Correction: OpenAI carried out an attack on RubyGems. Uh, what? How does a corporation carry out an attack? It is functionally nothing more than some words written down on a piece of paper. At least "agents" gives us…
Does the anthropomorphizing lead us down the wrong path? No. If it were you or I who set the same agents free we'd be burned at the stake. The anthropomorphizing has no effect. Does OpenAI being considered "too big to…
> It misdirects you away from who built the mower and aimed it. It does? Maybe temporarily, but blame always gets extended to all parties considered related in the end. For example, if it were instead a child who came…
> You have repeatedly confused yourself by assigning your own meanings to my words As instructed, the words were taken literally. If you meant that they were intended to be taken figuratively, why assert otherwise? >…
To be fair your dietician/healthcare professional might also be disappointed, but you're ultimately right, just like with college nobody else cares.
That doesn't make sense. If you want to take the food angle then the other serves homework. If you want to take the fraud angle then the other facilitates dietary fraud.
That's just the cost of entering the dating pool college offers.
Or own a car, which is what most people do. The problem is already solved. Just not to the hive mind's liking.
> But they are knowingly helping people cheat, right? In the same way a mom and pop pizza joint willingly serving someone who is trying to be on a strict healthy diet is helping people cheat, yes, but if McDonalds then…
> Banks are subject to much stricter regulation than any tech company is That's true, but remember what we're talking about: Using banks (or another trusted third-party) to assert your age instead of having big tech…
The part where the story keeps changing. You earlier asked us to take the literal text of the words, but in that literal text there is no mention of you working at the same company. It also literally asserts that you…
The message was directed at the employees. Their work may slow down, but that doesn't imply that all work will slow down. OpenAI also has this technology that purportedly can do the work without employees. In fact, if…
If I had a bank, I'd trust it too, it being mine. Most people don't have the luxury, though. In practice, they have to outsource banking to other people. And those other people are already quite likely to move around…
No need to guess new meanings. The message was loud and clear: '"What problem are we trying to solve?" is a question I have to ask constantly in corporate development environments, and rarely does anyone presenting the…
Well, how do you expect a website to know that you are 18+? The technical solution offered earlier was to have a trusted third-party only be willing to answer the "is this person 18+?" question. Of course, the same…
> Banks by law require substantial PII in order to even do business with you. That is technically true, but keep in mind that in the early days of banking banks expected you to provide that information without the hand…
> You (somewhat) trust your bank For what reason? > Since you know, they have your money. You may trust them with your money, but does not equate to trusting them with any other PII. Principle of least privilege, if you…
> Dairy farmers have put enough pressure on politicians across the political spectrum How? I do remember the big protests in the 90s quite well, certainly, but that was 30-some-odd years ago and when, as we saw earlier,…
> For bulk commodities, the US subsidies are largely commodity-specific and acre-based Again, the largest component is crop insurance, which is modelled essentially the same as it is in Canada. ~60% of the premium is…
> The US subsidies tend to be more indirect, meaning that the large agri-corporations capture most of it. It's essentially the same system, with the primary subsidy being paying 60% of crop insurance premium in Canada…
> Creating a fair and level trading system around it is difficult. There are no real limitations outside of dairy, poultry, and eggs; same as on the US front. If it is so difficult why is there nothing in place, aside…
> stolen every piece of human text ever written Those who argue copyright infringement have a somewhat compelling claim, but stolen is a little out there. Especially since text I have written has provably never been…
> I've seen no nation where the will of the people is typically manifested in the actions of the state. To be fair, I've seen no nation where the people make their will known. Does a democracy depend on actual action or…
There is nothing else in the comment except the bit about it being required by law, which doesn't change anything.
Just remove anything software-related from the training dataset. Which also solves the alignment problem with those who do not enjoy seeing LLMs write software. But that brings us back to: Aligned to whom?
> Correction: OpenAI carried out an attack on RubyGems. Uh, what? How does a corporation carry out an attack? It is functionally nothing more than some words written down on a piece of paper. At least "agents" gives us…
Does the anthropomorphizing lead us down the wrong path? No. If it were you or I who set the same agents free we'd be burned at the stake. The anthropomorphizing has no effect. Does OpenAI being considered "too big to…
> It misdirects you away from who built the mower and aimed it. It does? Maybe temporarily, but blame always gets extended to all parties considered related in the end. For example, if it were instead a child who came…
> You have repeatedly confused yourself by assigning your own meanings to my words As instructed, the words were taken literally. If you meant that they were intended to be taken figuratively, why assert otherwise? >…
To be fair your dietician/healthcare professional might also be disappointed, but you're ultimately right, just like with college nobody else cares.
That doesn't make sense. If you want to take the food angle then the other serves homework. If you want to take the fraud angle then the other facilitates dietary fraud.
That's just the cost of entering the dating pool college offers.
Or own a car, which is what most people do. The problem is already solved. Just not to the hive mind's liking.
> But they are knowingly helping people cheat, right? In the same way a mom and pop pizza joint willingly serving someone who is trying to be on a strict healthy diet is helping people cheat, yes, but if McDonalds then…
> Banks are subject to much stricter regulation than any tech company is That's true, but remember what we're talking about: Using banks (or another trusted third-party) to assert your age instead of having big tech…
The part where the story keeps changing. You earlier asked us to take the literal text of the words, but in that literal text there is no mention of you working at the same company. It also literally asserts that you…
The message was directed at the employees. Their work may slow down, but that doesn't imply that all work will slow down. OpenAI also has this technology that purportedly can do the work without employees. In fact, if…
If I had a bank, I'd trust it too, it being mine. Most people don't have the luxury, though. In practice, they have to outsource banking to other people. And those other people are already quite likely to move around…
No need to guess new meanings. The message was loud and clear: '"What problem are we trying to solve?" is a question I have to ask constantly in corporate development environments, and rarely does anyone presenting the…
Well, how do you expect a website to know that you are 18+? The technical solution offered earlier was to have a trusted third-party only be willing to answer the "is this person 18+?" question. Of course, the same…
> Banks by law require substantial PII in order to even do business with you. That is technically true, but keep in mind that in the early days of banking banks expected you to provide that information without the hand…
> You (somewhat) trust your bank For what reason? > Since you know, they have your money. You may trust them with your money, but does not equate to trusting them with any other PII. Principle of least privilege, if you…