By "implicit ordering", do you mean "implicitly assumed that the data is ordered a certain way"? Since if that assumption of data being sorted a certain way is broken on some systems and not others, the result might be…
Wouldn't such people just pass in maintain_order=False ?
Have Polars' inconsistent versioning policy caused you any problems?
It might make sense that you are confused, for Polars' versioning policy seems to be entirely inconsistent.
But Polars does: https://docs.pola.rs/development/versioning/ > Polars adheres to the semantic versioning specification: And it does have breaking changes in 2.0. The original asker presumably missed that. E: On the…
Perhaps to get better results on benchmarks.
By "implicit ordering", do you mean "implicitly assumed that the data is ordered a certain way"? Since if that assumption of data being sorted a certain way is broken on some systems and not others, the result might be…
Wouldn't such people just pass in maintain_order=False ?
Have Polars' inconsistent versioning policy caused you any problems?
It might make sense that you are confused, for Polars' versioning policy seems to be entirely inconsistent.
But Polars does: https://docs.pola.rs/development/versioning/ > Polars adheres to the semantic versioning specification: And it does have breaking changes in 2.0. The original asker presumably missed that. E: On the…
Perhaps to get better results on benchmarks.