Possibly -ffreestanding will help
The _fltused handling is quite crude: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/5cfd02f44a43a2e2a0... TLDR it's going to emit the reference if it's targeting MSVC and there's any float typed reference. You'd need to do…
I'd go so far as to say it's the exact opposite. It's faster and easier to change the hardware than the software.
clang does have pragma clang fp to enable a subset of fast math flags within a scope
This couldn't have a worse name. It's already used inside clang, and llvm. Searching "llvm CodeGen" will never find this.
Chrome is available on the App Store
It's really not. It's barely an abstraction over LLVM IR
I live on El Camino and frequently take the bus. It's a 40 minute walk to the nearest caltrain station
The keurig actually does have tea pods, which produce pretty awful tea
clBLAS
There is an OpenCL profiler for AMD, and library equivalents for those in clBLAS / clFFT
There isn't really anything fundamentally that would make CUDA faster that OpenCL. There aren't any huge semantic differences between them.
No, unfortunately front ends still need to be aware of some of the ABI details of the target to produce the IR for it.
I used to use it before working on it was my job.
But the 64-bit pointer support isn't there yet, so it's not super useful. You can't use it all within the same program
Most (probably nearly all, I've never seen one that doesn't) have bathrooms with showers.
Dear everyone, please stop using C as a compile target. Thanks.
I also think it mostly means the president won't see anybody's penis.
As if MS will implement C1X. They haven't caught up to the last C standard from 12 years ago
The alloca usage here terrifies me.
No, it's totally a sine wave.
Comments on saved ones might be nice. For example, on the one I started on, there appears to be a tiger in Colorado. I have an urge to comment and ask if that is in fact a tiger.
You don't use experiments to 'derive' the speed of light. You use Maxwell's equations.
Note the 'Automatic' qualifier on reference counting
Such is impossible under current copyright law
Possibly -ffreestanding will help
The _fltused handling is quite crude: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/5cfd02f44a43a2e2a0... TLDR it's going to emit the reference if it's targeting MSVC and there's any float typed reference. You'd need to do…
I'd go so far as to say it's the exact opposite. It's faster and easier to change the hardware than the software.
clang does have pragma clang fp to enable a subset of fast math flags within a scope
This couldn't have a worse name. It's already used inside clang, and llvm. Searching "llvm CodeGen" will never find this.
Chrome is available on the App Store
It's really not. It's barely an abstraction over LLVM IR
I live on El Camino and frequently take the bus. It's a 40 minute walk to the nearest caltrain station
The keurig actually does have tea pods, which produce pretty awful tea
clBLAS
There is an OpenCL profiler for AMD, and library equivalents for those in clBLAS / clFFT
There isn't really anything fundamentally that would make CUDA faster that OpenCL. There aren't any huge semantic differences between them.
No, unfortunately front ends still need to be aware of some of the ABI details of the target to produce the IR for it.
I used to use it before working on it was my job.
But the 64-bit pointer support isn't there yet, so it's not super useful. You can't use it all within the same program
Most (probably nearly all, I've never seen one that doesn't) have bathrooms with showers.
Dear everyone, please stop using C as a compile target. Thanks.
I also think it mostly means the president won't see anybody's penis.
As if MS will implement C1X. They haven't caught up to the last C standard from 12 years ago
The alloca usage here terrifies me.
No, it's totally a sine wave.
Comments on saved ones might be nice. For example, on the one I started on, there appears to be a tiger in Colorado. I have an urge to comment and ask if that is in fact a tiger.
You don't use experiments to 'derive' the speed of light. You use Maxwell's equations.
Note the 'Automatic' qualifier on reference counting
Such is impossible under current copyright law