As an European, I can't understand this beancounting. Yes, technically it may not be gambling, but that does not heal the issue. The problem a predatory practices that ultimately harm the victim in any way e.g. money…
Wait, why would the 50 GB need to be transferred fully every time if it was a fixed size image?
1. is wrong. You loose significant amount of time and too many people came unbounded. Currently, industry (including social media) has no interest in mitigating the adverse effect of feedback loops on the personal lives…
so why exactly does somebody backup into a image with variable size, when they could just dd together a fixed size image that makes these free space calculations unnecessary?
As an European, I can't understand this beancounting. Yes, technically it may not be gambling, but that does not heal the issue. The problem a predatory practices that ultimately harm the victim in any way e.g. money…
Wait, why would the 50 GB need to be transferred fully every time if it was a fixed size image?
1. is wrong. You loose significant amount of time and too many people came unbounded. Currently, industry (including social media) has no interest in mitigating the adverse effect of feedback loops on the personal lives…
so why exactly does somebody backup into a image with variable size, when they could just dd together a fixed size image that makes these free space calculations unnecessary?