Again, which community are you talking about, exactly? I only know of two - the contributor community and the actual user community.
The CLA provides for a dual license option, but does not impact the GPL nature of Audacity. Audacity was/is/always will be GPL.
The actual issue is a bit different than what is perceived. This comes down to the actual definition of community. Our priority is the contributor community and the user community as a WHOLE. Of those complaining on…
We do understand that the CLA will discourage some from contributing. Audacity is transitioning from an entirely voluntary development team to a team of many engineers, designers, testers, project managers, and a…
Audacity was, is, and will always be GPL. The CLA does not change this. The CLA simply provides a dual license option for distribution through channels that may not be GPL friendly (ex: app stores). Look at the…
Again, which community are you talking about, exactly? I only know of two - the contributor community and the actual user community.
The CLA provides for a dual license option, but does not impact the GPL nature of Audacity. Audacity was/is/always will be GPL.
The actual issue is a bit different than what is perceived. This comes down to the actual definition of community. Our priority is the contributor community and the user community as a WHOLE. Of those complaining on…
We do understand that the CLA will discourage some from contributing. Audacity is transitioning from an entirely voluntary development team to a team of many engineers, designers, testers, project managers, and a…
Audacity was, is, and will always be GPL. The CLA does not change this. The CLA simply provides a dual license option for distribution through channels that may not be GPL friendly (ex: app stores). Look at the…