I'm fine with that if we can remove the technical error rate and barriers to actually executing these people. If you're caught in a situation like this you should not be in jail on death row for twenty years waiting for…
I do not seek perfection. We have a justice system which makes those determinations, its not about perfection, it never has been.
Its not about vengeance or a desire for closure, I simply do not want these people to continue to exist. They offer no benefit to my society, they contribute nothing beneficial and never will, the sooner they are erased…
Can you have compassion, love even, for someone who has been the victim of horrific acts? Honest question, what are your limits of compassion? Do you have compassion, love, or have you given a thought to the next victim…
> So you're ok with the state killing criminals? Yes. > What if they get the wrong person? Don't kill those.
> assuming he must be guilty of something awful He is. He is guilty of doing something his employer didn't like and they fired him for it.
Nonsense. If you read the original article it specifically says he sought out the protestors. > he went to the lounge on the 10th floor of Google’s New York City office around lunchtime to check out the protest. Is a…
His commentary isn't the exonerating statement you seem to think it is. By his own admission he sought to join the protestors (he went to the lounge on the 10th floor of Google’s New York City office around lunchtime to…
And, as I pointed out in my original comment, google has massive information asymmetry here. They have video and email and message history and badge access times and maybe audio recording and maybe more, who knows. So…
I also don't think this counts as a strike, at least the actions taken do not fully fall within the protections of a strike even if they were striking for a reason for which strikes are permitted. Disruptive protest…
> Google apparently fired some 20+ employees who either weren't involved the protest at all, or whose alleged participation remains unclear Maybe that's true, maybe it's not, but there is deep information asymmetry here…
The meat of it is here: > Google “retaliated against approximately 50 employees and interfered with their Section 7 rights by terminating and/or placing them on administrative leave in response to their protected…
Apologies for calling it by it's historical name instead of the revisionist one the British gave it.
I'm not saying they aren't capable of committing war crimes or genocide or whatever other terms you want to use. Clearly Israel is eminently capable of simply flattening Gaza (and Judaea/Samaria if they wanted) and they…
Because genocide definitionally requires intent. > Genocide is the intentional destruction of a people in whole or in part.. Wikipedia
For missiles? The government already decides that for you. You can only (and only somewhat) decide to not sell things the government says you can to people the government says you can. Aside from that? Jail.
[flagged]
Oh no. Jeff will have to make his next yacht 1 foot shorter. Seriously, I have a hard time caring about this.
where in the 5000 word article does it talk about compelled speech, I skimmed it and searched and I don't see anything.
This is barring them from saying specific things, not compelling them to say other things, do you have an example of any compelled speech?
he should be made to pay 1 billion million trillion dollars. his ability to pay my made up number is about on par with his ability to pay the courts made up number, at this point it's just political theatre and…
> Just because a project or budget is black doesn't necessarily mean it's useless or nefarious. Of course not, it does mean that we don't have the ability to know if it is useless or nefarious or not.
I'm not trying to debate the rightness or wrongness of Alex Berenson, I'm simply pointing to this as an example of the federal government strong-arming corporations into censoring people. Alex Berenson might be someone…
If you seriously think that people in the federal government don't try to control the media narrative, you're ignoring a huge body of history where they have done exactly that. Most recently, look at the white house…
No, because, when you're paying for an education you can also get loans (at usurious rates) to cover cost of living expenses too! You won't pay now for that 10k/year required meal plan for cafeteria food and 20k/year…
I'm fine with that if we can remove the technical error rate and barriers to actually executing these people. If you're caught in a situation like this you should not be in jail on death row for twenty years waiting for…
I do not seek perfection. We have a justice system which makes those determinations, its not about perfection, it never has been.
Its not about vengeance or a desire for closure, I simply do not want these people to continue to exist. They offer no benefit to my society, they contribute nothing beneficial and never will, the sooner they are erased…
Can you have compassion, love even, for someone who has been the victim of horrific acts? Honest question, what are your limits of compassion? Do you have compassion, love, or have you given a thought to the next victim…
> So you're ok with the state killing criminals? Yes. > What if they get the wrong person? Don't kill those.
> assuming he must be guilty of something awful He is. He is guilty of doing something his employer didn't like and they fired him for it.
Nonsense. If you read the original article it specifically says he sought out the protestors. > he went to the lounge on the 10th floor of Google’s New York City office around lunchtime to check out the protest. Is a…
His commentary isn't the exonerating statement you seem to think it is. By his own admission he sought to join the protestors (he went to the lounge on the 10th floor of Google’s New York City office around lunchtime to…
And, as I pointed out in my original comment, google has massive information asymmetry here. They have video and email and message history and badge access times and maybe audio recording and maybe more, who knows. So…
I also don't think this counts as a strike, at least the actions taken do not fully fall within the protections of a strike even if they were striking for a reason for which strikes are permitted. Disruptive protest…
> Google apparently fired some 20+ employees who either weren't involved the protest at all, or whose alleged participation remains unclear Maybe that's true, maybe it's not, but there is deep information asymmetry here…
The meat of it is here: > Google “retaliated against approximately 50 employees and interfered with their Section 7 rights by terminating and/or placing them on administrative leave in response to their protected…
Apologies for calling it by it's historical name instead of the revisionist one the British gave it.
I'm not saying they aren't capable of committing war crimes or genocide or whatever other terms you want to use. Clearly Israel is eminently capable of simply flattening Gaza (and Judaea/Samaria if they wanted) and they…
Because genocide definitionally requires intent. > Genocide is the intentional destruction of a people in whole or in part.. Wikipedia
For missiles? The government already decides that for you. You can only (and only somewhat) decide to not sell things the government says you can to people the government says you can. Aside from that? Jail.
[flagged]
Oh no. Jeff will have to make his next yacht 1 foot shorter. Seriously, I have a hard time caring about this.
where in the 5000 word article does it talk about compelled speech, I skimmed it and searched and I don't see anything.
This is barring them from saying specific things, not compelling them to say other things, do you have an example of any compelled speech?
he should be made to pay 1 billion million trillion dollars. his ability to pay my made up number is about on par with his ability to pay the courts made up number, at this point it's just political theatre and…
> Just because a project or budget is black doesn't necessarily mean it's useless or nefarious. Of course not, it does mean that we don't have the ability to know if it is useless or nefarious or not.
I'm not trying to debate the rightness or wrongness of Alex Berenson, I'm simply pointing to this as an example of the federal government strong-arming corporations into censoring people. Alex Berenson might be someone…
If you seriously think that people in the federal government don't try to control the media narrative, you're ignoring a huge body of history where they have done exactly that. Most recently, look at the white house…
No, because, when you're paying for an education you can also get loans (at usurious rates) to cover cost of living expenses too! You won't pay now for that 10k/year required meal plan for cafeteria food and 20k/year…