Your reply is essentially spam. Please stop.
>Why do you see the truth as a lie? I don't. Read what I said again. You were lying about what the other person said, i.e. attacking a strawman. >Except there is plenty of evidence across the world for over twenty years…
AFAIK there are no strings attached, the changes were postponed in June: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-clau...
Oh, they postponed that in June: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-clau...
Why are you lying about what the other person said? They said "no meaningful fraud" as in there's not an amount of fraud that can actually change the results.
What strings are attached? I thought they reverted the API usage changes
Please actually read the article instead of being dishonest. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49449449
You, obviously, have neither. A person without a spine is one thing but one without both is just vile, abhorrent cowardice incarnate.
At the time of writing your post 90% of them were talking about the article. That, obviously, necessitates talking about the administration. I guess you interpreted people saying anything other than "I love this admin"…
There's numerous civil conversations happening. Why would you tell such an easily disprovable lie? Could you explain how the people talking about their experience having to avoid specific words in their grant request…
I suggest you actually read the first amendment. Maybe you'll understand then.
None. It's lying, as usual.
No, that is not the definition of "freedom of speech". Please also read the first amendment.
Grow a spine.
Why would you say something so ridiculous?
I hope the moderators here do something about the AI spambot accounts such as the above. One example is here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49076441 There is, of course, simply no good faith rationale for…
Yes it is! the Mondragon Accords. my first thought when seeing the title :) had no idea the name was based on something real! Have been listening to an audio-book of 2312 when I have the time to be fully attentive
What?
Terrible, perhaps even knowingly dishonest, analogy.
The opposite is true, actually.
you cannot be serious. wtf?
Wait the FTC is suing Mozilla?
>Not sure who determines the threshold The SEC. >he certainly goes to court more than your average person Yes because he sues a lot of entities for silly things such as some advertisers declining to buy ads that display…
[flagged]
aaand he never replied It is like they're brainwashed. Awful.
Your reply is essentially spam. Please stop.
>Why do you see the truth as a lie? I don't. Read what I said again. You were lying about what the other person said, i.e. attacking a strawman. >Except there is plenty of evidence across the world for over twenty years…
AFAIK there are no strings attached, the changes were postponed in June: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-clau...
Oh, they postponed that in June: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-clau...
Why are you lying about what the other person said? They said "no meaningful fraud" as in there's not an amount of fraud that can actually change the results.
What strings are attached? I thought they reverted the API usage changes
Please actually read the article instead of being dishonest. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49449449
You, obviously, have neither. A person without a spine is one thing but one without both is just vile, abhorrent cowardice incarnate.
At the time of writing your post 90% of them were talking about the article. That, obviously, necessitates talking about the administration. I guess you interpreted people saying anything other than "I love this admin"…
There's numerous civil conversations happening. Why would you tell such an easily disprovable lie? Could you explain how the people talking about their experience having to avoid specific words in their grant request…
I suggest you actually read the first amendment. Maybe you'll understand then.
None. It's lying, as usual.
No, that is not the definition of "freedom of speech". Please also read the first amendment.
Grow a spine.
Why would you say something so ridiculous?
I hope the moderators here do something about the AI spambot accounts such as the above. One example is here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49076441 There is, of course, simply no good faith rationale for…
Yes it is! the Mondragon Accords. my first thought when seeing the title :) had no idea the name was based on something real! Have been listening to an audio-book of 2312 when I have the time to be fully attentive
What?
Terrible, perhaps even knowingly dishonest, analogy.
The opposite is true, actually.
you cannot be serious. wtf?
Wait the FTC is suing Mozilla?
>Not sure who determines the threshold The SEC. >he certainly goes to court more than your average person Yes because he sues a lot of entities for silly things such as some advertisers declining to buy ads that display…
[flagged]
aaand he never replied It is like they're brainwashed. Awful.