Yeah I know, patronizing random nobody. Does not mean the model is accurate. The model is Schrödinger's cat. Philosophical twaddle was not the point. Was just calling you arrogant. Never forget only 6-10 others will…
[dead]
When faced with an information asymmetry (lack of knowledge of other posters) you engage in a kind of phrenology... taking a few sentences of others and filling in huge gaps in your knowledge with biases that you cannot…
If you're so sure you're ignorant of those topics why are those measures meaningful? Why answer what may just be some words you know but irrelevant to the context? Can you prove the so-called experts know better? Or are…
Yeah I know, patronizing random nobody. Does not mean the model is accurate. The model is Schrödinger's cat. Philosophical twaddle was not the point. Was just calling you arrogant. Never forget only 6-10 others will…
[dead]
[dead]
When faced with an information asymmetry (lack of knowledge of other posters) you engage in a kind of phrenology... taking a few sentences of others and filling in huge gaps in your knowledge with biases that you cannot…
If you're so sure you're ignorant of those topics why are those measures meaningful? Why answer what may just be some words you know but irrelevant to the context? Can you prove the so-called experts know better? Or are…