> I think my counterpoint was stronger. No, what I was saying was that your counterpoint isn't a counterpoint. A counterpoint would be: Google shouldn't show new kinds of things on the map (such as houses, small…
I just wanted to say thank you to author for this incredibly high quality, well done piece. Looking forward to reading the next parts!
> Less is more. You don't want to show as much information as you can... 100% agree, but I don't think it's saying more is better. Rather that because maps now have dozens of zoom-levels (as opposed to just 1 with paper…
> I think my counterpoint was stronger. No, what I was saying was that your counterpoint isn't a counterpoint. A counterpoint would be: Google shouldn't show new kinds of things on the map (such as houses, small…
I just wanted to say thank you to author for this incredibly high quality, well done piece. Looking forward to reading the next parts!
> Less is more. You don't want to show as much information as you can... 100% agree, but I don't think it's saying more is better. Rather that because maps now have dozens of zoom-levels (as opposed to just 1 with paper…