Your TLS argument is true. That however does not make it any less insecure. You see, People around the world click 'proceed anyway' on so many of those websites. That is what happens when APs in coffee shops are…
You could easily be a MITM using the de-authentication message. Not everyone has access or the funds to get a jammer. Making it more "Vulnerable" Take a gander at EVIL TWINS: https://rootsh3ll.com/evil-twin-attack/
You are right, the protocol is broken. But that is only because it was accepted with a flaw that should be fixable. While re-starting routers it was possible for an attacker to re-use nuonces (number used once). Because…
Your TLS argument is true. That however does not make it any less insecure. You see, People around the world click 'proceed anyway' on so many of those websites. That is what happens when APs in coffee shops are…
You could easily be a MITM using the de-authentication message. Not everyone has access or the funds to get a jammer. Making it more "Vulnerable" Take a gander at EVIL TWINS: https://rootsh3ll.com/evil-twin-attack/
You are right, the protocol is broken. But that is only because it was accepted with a flaw that should be fixable. While re-starting routers it was possible for an attacker to re-use nuonces (number used once). Because…