> and her judgments about whom to fund have proven to be accurate. As mentioned to Paul, you lack the data to establish what would have happened if you had funded other people instead. > Sorry to disappoint you…
> Of the four YC partners, she is the best judge of people, and that's the main thing we're judging at this early stage. "Best judge of people" is sufficiently nonspecific to not be a testable claim. If you mean she…
JL was PG's girlfriend, which is how she got involved in this stuff. So she interviewed some founders. Then she did organizing for start-up school and administrative duties for YC. Not sure what you mean about…
> and her judgments about whom to fund have proven to be accurate. As mentioned to Paul, you lack the data to establish what would have happened if you had funded other people instead. > Sorry to disappoint you…
> Of the four YC partners, she is the best judge of people, and that's the main thing we're judging at this early stage. "Best judge of people" is sufficiently nonspecific to not be a testable claim. If you mean she…
JL was PG's girlfriend, which is how she got involved in this stuff. So she interviewed some founders. Then she did organizing for start-up school and administrative duties for YC. Not sure what you mean about…