Google is an ad tech company that occasionally makes a weird choice to launch other products.
I think it bears mentioning that like sand castles, software engineering has approximately zero building codes. Try kicking over a building sometime. (Or don't - you'll stub your toe).
This is how we end up with "regulations written in blood", btw. That and "oh, it's just software for a website that doesn't do anything important that couldn't actually damage anything".
> there's a type of person that clearly is on their last job of their career and knows it Yup (and it's not ageism). I'm young and stupid but forced by circumstance to practice a certain degree of respect for my own…
Yeah, this is making me real glad that I know C well enough to stop being afraid of it. Pinning certificates in a browser was a brilliant idea for Chrome because web browsers are not made for technical users. But…
"There's no off-the-shelf option" is not a good reason to trash a preexisting component. Build another one.
"interesting" in the same way that folks in the south say "Bless your heart".
> By virtue of Claude’s ability to write immense amounts of code much faster than we could ourselves, Scion is among the most well-tested and well-defended codebases we have ever worked on. made me throw up in my mouth…
> Plus, Anthropic is unique in that our ability to spend tokens for internal use far exceeds what any other business would realistically want to spend. Wake me up when somebody tells them that they still have to pay for…
Infringing on 4th amendment rights sounds like a crime to me.
LLMs are the ultimate "pin-headed manager who wants to pay programmers by the line and starts yanking cables that they don't understand"
The term "Chesterton's Fence" comes to mind. There's no harm in critically examining why a tradition is there (especially if harmful in other ways). But a lot of the time, "it's a long story" does actually have a…
PSA: Do not eat the yellow snow. There are not 15 hot singles in your area looking to meet up. Do not click mystery "Link to download" blobs from strangers.
Yep. It boggles my mind that software engineering is not a "strict liability" field.
Regarding > The only thing that bothered me is that gender affirming is in fact an amputation, because they gave their clitorises to science. one of the linked articles reads > Peters collected samples from one side of…
[humor] The studio must've done something worse than introduce new technology, because they found a way to get Nic Cage to turn down a role.
My points of reference are - Whatever Matthew McConaughey did to protect himself legally against AI-generated use of his likeness - Whatever Michael Jackson's and Tupac's estates did to handle postmortem work. (Namely,…
Somebody bring back the ABET SWE PE exam already.
Serious question, what sort of FAFO timelines did you see? (And I assume that there's a sliver of people who never went this route in the first place, and another sliver who never stopped).
Respectfully, I'm sure that there's some exotic usecase that is motivating the question, but > nobody in decades thought to make this information accessible to the programmer > otherwise free could not work I'm inclined…
> we would use something called nunununuC "C++", perhaps? :)
That is because C already worked everywhere even before CPU makers agreed on things like making pointers and words the same size. Edit: And by "worked everywhere" I mean C did the heavy lifting of being a programming…
I'm with you there. > if they are going to remove compatibility C as a language has one job, and it is to not do this.
If it's any consolation, I figured that the author was using "Rust programmer" as a shorthand way to say "I know Rust best and that tends to be my point of comparison when learning other programming languages. But…
> As such, there are plenty of "Rust for C Programmers" articles on the internet, but little to no "C for Rust Programmers" articles out there. [obligatory] The original "C for ... programmers" article that convinced…
Google is an ad tech company that occasionally makes a weird choice to launch other products.
I think it bears mentioning that like sand castles, software engineering has approximately zero building codes. Try kicking over a building sometime. (Or don't - you'll stub your toe).
This is how we end up with "regulations written in blood", btw. That and "oh, it's just software for a website that doesn't do anything important that couldn't actually damage anything".
> there's a type of person that clearly is on their last job of their career and knows it Yup (and it's not ageism). I'm young and stupid but forced by circumstance to practice a certain degree of respect for my own…
Yeah, this is making me real glad that I know C well enough to stop being afraid of it. Pinning certificates in a browser was a brilliant idea for Chrome because web browsers are not made for technical users. But…
"There's no off-the-shelf option" is not a good reason to trash a preexisting component. Build another one.
"interesting" in the same way that folks in the south say "Bless your heart".
> By virtue of Claude’s ability to write immense amounts of code much faster than we could ourselves, Scion is among the most well-tested and well-defended codebases we have ever worked on. made me throw up in my mouth…
> Plus, Anthropic is unique in that our ability to spend tokens for internal use far exceeds what any other business would realistically want to spend. Wake me up when somebody tells them that they still have to pay for…
Infringing on 4th amendment rights sounds like a crime to me.
LLMs are the ultimate "pin-headed manager who wants to pay programmers by the line and starts yanking cables that they don't understand"
The term "Chesterton's Fence" comes to mind. There's no harm in critically examining why a tradition is there (especially if harmful in other ways). But a lot of the time, "it's a long story" does actually have a…
PSA: Do not eat the yellow snow. There are not 15 hot singles in your area looking to meet up. Do not click mystery "Link to download" blobs from strangers.
Yep. It boggles my mind that software engineering is not a "strict liability" field.
Regarding > The only thing that bothered me is that gender affirming is in fact an amputation, because they gave their clitorises to science. one of the linked articles reads > Peters collected samples from one side of…
[humor] The studio must've done something worse than introduce new technology, because they found a way to get Nic Cage to turn down a role.
My points of reference are - Whatever Matthew McConaughey did to protect himself legally against AI-generated use of his likeness - Whatever Michael Jackson's and Tupac's estates did to handle postmortem work. (Namely,…
Somebody bring back the ABET SWE PE exam already.
Serious question, what sort of FAFO timelines did you see? (And I assume that there's a sliver of people who never went this route in the first place, and another sliver who never stopped).
Respectfully, I'm sure that there's some exotic usecase that is motivating the question, but > nobody in decades thought to make this information accessible to the programmer > otherwise free could not work I'm inclined…
> we would use something called nunununuC "C++", perhaps? :)
That is because C already worked everywhere even before CPU makers agreed on things like making pointers and words the same size. Edit: And by "worked everywhere" I mean C did the heavy lifting of being a programming…
I'm with you there. > if they are going to remove compatibility C as a language has one job, and it is to not do this.
If it's any consolation, I figured that the author was using "Rust programmer" as a shorthand way to say "I know Rust best and that tends to be my point of comparison when learning other programming languages. But…
> As such, there are plenty of "Rust for C Programmers" articles on the internet, but little to no "C for Rust Programmers" articles out there. [obligatory] The original "C for ... programmers" article that convinced…