Actually I was really happy you included an example because it demonstrates just how hard is it to make a rule so clear that no one has to guess again. It requires adding all the detail and addressing all the nuance and…
Doesn't 1:1 correspondence between input and output just mean the compiler output is deterministic. There is no requirement that the output is machine code. For example cfront [1] was a complier whose output was C. To…
> "Opus writes better code than me" Probably true for some definitions of me. :)
I'm not so sure about that in the generic sense. This sentence from the article really stuck out to me. > and you write the rule down so clearly that nobody (human or otherwise) has to guess again. Writing rules, or…
I also found the approach interesting but I've also noticed real players have personalities, i.e. do they push for open or closed positions, and they have tactical strengths and weaknesses. So the probabilities of…
On the other hand, post-release patches made very complex software practical. And very complex software takes a very long time to test and people want the new stuff now. There is no easy or even single "correct" answer.…
It's a trade-off. It could be a setting, but if one adds too many settings then the space of possible options gets huge and bloated leading to bugs and complexity for the users and I already barely know how to use…
LLM's were terrible at chess last year. Today, they can't beat stockfish but they can play competitively with the top 2% of chess players. Next year, who knows. https://chessbenchllm.onrender.com
The moat of the closed source EDA tools is the validation hours that went into them. I use the open source EDA tools for VLSI everyday and I do like them, especially how hackable they are, but they are very unreliable…
Actually I was really happy you included an example because it demonstrates just how hard is it to make a rule so clear that no one has to guess again. It requires adding all the detail and addressing all the nuance and…
Doesn't 1:1 correspondence between input and output just mean the compiler output is deterministic. There is no requirement that the output is machine code. For example cfront [1] was a complier whose output was C. To…
> "Opus writes better code than me" Probably true for some definitions of me. :)
I'm not so sure about that in the generic sense. This sentence from the article really stuck out to me. > and you write the rule down so clearly that nobody (human or otherwise) has to guess again. Writing rules, or…
I also found the approach interesting but I've also noticed real players have personalities, i.e. do they push for open or closed positions, and they have tactical strengths and weaknesses. So the probabilities of…
On the other hand, post-release patches made very complex software practical. And very complex software takes a very long time to test and people want the new stuff now. There is no easy or even single "correct" answer.…
It's a trade-off. It could be a setting, but if one adds too many settings then the space of possible options gets huge and bloated leading to bugs and complexity for the users and I already barely know how to use…
LLM's were terrible at chess last year. Today, they can't beat stockfish but they can play competitively with the top 2% of chess players. Next year, who knows. https://chessbenchllm.onrender.com
The moat of the closed source EDA tools is the validation hours that went into them. I use the open source EDA tools for VLSI everyday and I do like them, especially how hackable they are, but they are very unreliable…