real ones find out with "a user you’ve blocked has previously contributed..." banner at the top
neat concept at first, but after a few clicks - who drew all that pixel art?.. it's all the artists whose work was stolen, isn't it. claude's already in repo too this is what ruins every other project presented…
"summary, a, b, c, why it matters" + fillers like the summarization tools based on those models except it's the opposite, it was fluffed up into a long article
perhaps wasn't your intent, but this clearly demonstrates the benefit of those kinds of rules for everybody around both on codeberg and here. and you're still here
oh they will "try" to fix it, as in at best they'll add "don't make mistakes", as the blogpost suggests. that's about as much effort and good faith as one can expect from people determined to automate every interaction…
and the formatting, and "the cool part? the weird part? the catch?", and "engaging" questions at the end of not just this but other posts on that blog unfortunately the writing is getting praised even here so it will…
or at least better compatibility with reader view... it would just make sense. i was about to suggest it when it worked with brave's one (xtwitter articles and bluesky threads didn't), but then it didn't work in safari
real ones find out with "a user you’ve blocked has previously contributed..." banner at the top
neat concept at first, but after a few clicks - who drew all that pixel art?.. it's all the artists whose work was stolen, isn't it. claude's already in repo too this is what ruins every other project presented…
"summary, a, b, c, why it matters" + fillers like the summarization tools based on those models except it's the opposite, it was fluffed up into a long article
perhaps wasn't your intent, but this clearly demonstrates the benefit of those kinds of rules for everybody around both on codeberg and here. and you're still here
oh they will "try" to fix it, as in at best they'll add "don't make mistakes", as the blogpost suggests. that's about as much effort and good faith as one can expect from people determined to automate every interaction…
and the formatting, and "the cool part? the weird part? the catch?", and "engaging" questions at the end of not just this but other posts on that blog unfortunately the writing is getting praised even here so it will…
or at least better compatibility with reader view... it would just make sense. i was about to suggest it when it worked with brave's one (xtwitter articles and bluesky threads didn't), but then it didn't work in safari