Sure, theoretical investigations on things begin many years earlier than anyone starts actually using them, but somehow "concurrency" wasn't something available to your everyday Joe back in 60s, right? Multi-core wasn't…
I wonder if he would claim the same argument today as he does in this[1] comment, in particular the paragraph "On side effects being bad <..>". I would dare to claim that there's some trend to do things more…
Yes, I am only claiming that it results in shorter code for the code which deals with problems in that specific domain. In general -- obviously not! But the overall gain is still significant. I don't care if e.g. some…
> erlang is great for anything that requires a lot of moving pieces and doesn't require the code to actually look nice or be readable" Sorry, but this is such a BS claim. Yes, there are bits of Erlang syntax which…
Someone needs to make a poster for this, I'd put it up in our department.
Now someone please explain Skolem's paradox to a 12 year old.
I'm sorry, but his photography is terrible. Cliche, boring and not even that well produced in the technical sense.
Sure, theoretical investigations on things begin many years earlier than anyone starts actually using them, but somehow "concurrency" wasn't something available to your everyday Joe back in 60s, right? Multi-core wasn't…
I wonder if he would claim the same argument today as he does in this[1] comment, in particular the paragraph "On side effects being bad <..>". I would dare to claim that there's some trend to do things more…
Yes, I am only claiming that it results in shorter code for the code which deals with problems in that specific domain. In general -- obviously not! But the overall gain is still significant. I don't care if e.g. some…
> erlang is great for anything that requires a lot of moving pieces and doesn't require the code to actually look nice or be readable" Sorry, but this is such a BS claim. Yes, there are bits of Erlang syntax which…
Someone needs to make a poster for this, I'd put it up in our department.
Now someone please explain Skolem's paradox to a 12 year old.
I'm sorry, but his photography is terrible. Cliche, boring and not even that well produced in the technical sense.