Though I see a difference between "obsoleted to prop up sales of new gadgets" and "throttled to improve stability", Apple failed at comms here. But it's the modern mantra to do it anyway and apologize if someone…
> There's a reason that who it is matters, and unfortunately, that still leads to people being selected who reflect the starting set of less-than-diverse people. I'd agree with arguments that this is true more because…
I can't help but think you're talking about modern billionaires too, like Bill Gates or Buffet, who basically traded in a finance market measures of others efforts. Did he provide a benefit? Sure. Did he provide one…
"...which is very far from actual data" The study used a measure the poster did not think was accurate.
Though I see a difference between "obsoleted to prop up sales of new gadgets" and "throttled to improve stability", Apple failed at comms here. But it's the modern mantra to do it anyway and apologize if someone…
> There's a reason that who it is matters, and unfortunately, that still leads to people being selected who reflect the starting set of less-than-diverse people. I'd agree with arguments that this is true more because…
I can't help but think you're talking about modern billionaires too, like Bill Gates or Buffet, who basically traded in a finance market measures of others efforts. Did he provide a benefit? Sure. Did he provide one…
"...which is very far from actual data" The study used a measure the poster did not think was accurate.