Comment from every dang year. The more recent complaints have been about Github being ruined by Microsoft. And this is why MS gets away with EEE, because people have short memories and say to themselves "nah, it won't…
Embrace. Extend. <-- You are here. Extinguish.
> Everyone connecting these TVs to the internet has access to the internet to tell them not to do that. > I just am baffled how so many still fall for this. Because you're assuming everybody else is you, cares about the…
> So most consumers are willing to knowingly "Knowingly". No, they don't know. You seem to think that because you know, then so must everybody else. I have no words for how depressing that way of thinking is.
> But surely you know No? It's hardly written in the advertising copy for the TV, is it. This is a technical website with technical users. You are failing to put yourself in the shoes of non-technical, ordinary users…
Not just a repo/index but they also offer reasonably-priced compute, with a free tier not to sniff at, on which to run the models.
Who is this person? Why should I care about this?
> Not to mention the problematic nature of trusting any data coming from a country known for state-sponsored deception, trolling and organized operations in informational warfare. What, like the United States of…
Cue responses from all the people a week ago moaning about it not being open source on day one, despite there being a precedent from Chris Lattner that it would all go down exactly like this.
You responded better than I thought you might, credit where credit's due. Have a good one.
From your profile: > "You're posting too fast. Please slow down. Thanks." = censorship. Unaccountable [flag] = censorship. > Mass un-elaborated on downvoting = censorship; needing 500 karma to downvote = censorship. >…
2025 and 2026 have proven that to be vastly untrue. It was never true. If it was anything, it was rampant laziness.
It's not just N, it's Z.
Meanwhile, five minutes for the next one is luxury in my neck of the woods where you're more likely to wait 30 minutes to find out the next one is cancelled.
> That's my point. It's a lot more complicated It's not so complicated that you assume you need to run out at this very moment to find the nearest elevator just to prove a point. That's moronic. > There are escalators…
> I think the nearest one is a mile away, that seems really inconvenient and unnecessary I think this way of thinking, being obtuse on purpose to try to win an internet argument (without a prize, no less), is the more…
And some sports games, which is where it seems clear they just wanted their own Wii Sports. Not so much the game itself so much as the excuse for the masses to buy a console for a game even grandpa can play.
It was 100% chasing the Wii. It didn't chase all that hard, either.
They look much better.
Why are all the screenshots showing a translucent window. If “it is designed specifically for power users who want […] zero interface clutter”, why advertise it by making it look like it needs a going over with Spray &…
Your comment got downvoted for being flippant but I agree. It's an interesting discussion but it really comes off as grandstanding. Doesn't address the main thrust of the article nor the comment to which it replies.
> outright admission of failure Right!? Who's out there going "oh no, translucent is too translucent; opaque is too opaque; but now that I can have 72.93% glass, my life is complete"?
Mac OS X 27. 10.27? But that means there were two each of 10.11, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14, and 10.15 :-)
Voilà, I think you may have fallen for their trap. That's why they've done nothing about this to date even though volume normalisation is a solved problem.
It's on the front page now.
Comment from every dang year. The more recent complaints have been about Github being ruined by Microsoft. And this is why MS gets away with EEE, because people have short memories and say to themselves "nah, it won't…
Embrace. Extend. <-- You are here. Extinguish.
> Everyone connecting these TVs to the internet has access to the internet to tell them not to do that. > I just am baffled how so many still fall for this. Because you're assuming everybody else is you, cares about the…
> So most consumers are willing to knowingly "Knowingly". No, they don't know. You seem to think that because you know, then so must everybody else. I have no words for how depressing that way of thinking is.
> But surely you know No? It's hardly written in the advertising copy for the TV, is it. This is a technical website with technical users. You are failing to put yourself in the shoes of non-technical, ordinary users…
Not just a repo/index but they also offer reasonably-priced compute, with a free tier not to sniff at, on which to run the models.
Who is this person? Why should I care about this?
> Not to mention the problematic nature of trusting any data coming from a country known for state-sponsored deception, trolling and organized operations in informational warfare. What, like the United States of…
Cue responses from all the people a week ago moaning about it not being open source on day one, despite there being a precedent from Chris Lattner that it would all go down exactly like this.
You responded better than I thought you might, credit where credit's due. Have a good one.
From your profile: > "You're posting too fast. Please slow down. Thanks." = censorship. Unaccountable [flag] = censorship. > Mass un-elaborated on downvoting = censorship; needing 500 karma to downvote = censorship. >…
2025 and 2026 have proven that to be vastly untrue. It was never true. If it was anything, it was rampant laziness.
It's not just N, it's Z.
Meanwhile, five minutes for the next one is luxury in my neck of the woods where you're more likely to wait 30 minutes to find out the next one is cancelled.
> That's my point. It's a lot more complicated It's not so complicated that you assume you need to run out at this very moment to find the nearest elevator just to prove a point. That's moronic. > There are escalators…
> I think the nearest one is a mile away, that seems really inconvenient and unnecessary I think this way of thinking, being obtuse on purpose to try to win an internet argument (without a prize, no less), is the more…
And some sports games, which is where it seems clear they just wanted their own Wii Sports. Not so much the game itself so much as the excuse for the masses to buy a console for a game even grandpa can play.
It was 100% chasing the Wii. It didn't chase all that hard, either.
They look much better.
Why are all the screenshots showing a translucent window. If “it is designed specifically for power users who want […] zero interface clutter”, why advertise it by making it look like it needs a going over with Spray &…
Your comment got downvoted for being flippant but I agree. It's an interesting discussion but it really comes off as grandstanding. Doesn't address the main thrust of the article nor the comment to which it replies.
> outright admission of failure Right!? Who's out there going "oh no, translucent is too translucent; opaque is too opaque; but now that I can have 72.93% glass, my life is complete"?
Mac OS X 27. 10.27? But that means there were two each of 10.11, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14, and 10.15 :-)
Voilà, I think you may have fallen for their trap. That's why they've done nothing about this to date even though volume normalisation is a solved problem.
It's on the front page now.