Lojban relies on implicit pragmatics just like any language. It's not that it's unambiguous. That's essentially impossible without also making the language impractical. It's precisely ambiguous meaning that one can be…
Can you clarify your question ?
I'm one of the few conversation Lojban speakers, and after years extended study, I've found the language does not meet expectations. When you start deeply exploring the semantics, many constructs are only half defined…
Lojban relies on implicit pragmatics just like any language. It's not that it's unambiguous. That's essentially impossible without also making the language impractical. It's precisely ambiguous meaning that one can be…
Can you clarify your question ?
I'm one of the few conversation Lojban speakers, and after years extended study, I've found the language does not meet expectations. When you start deeply exploring the semantics, many constructs are only half defined…