Being a bad paper, even a "never should have been published", is not sufficient reason for retroactively un-publishing a refereed and published paper. A rebuttal or at worst retraction is the appropriate action in that…
I liked your response a lot. Thank you. And I was almost persuaded by it. In fact I was persuaded for about 5 minutes after reading it. But at the last second, a thought occurred to me: if there's a deficiency in…
Being a bad paper, even a "never should have been published", is not sufficient reason for retroactively un-publishing a refereed and published paper. A rebuttal or at worst retraction is the appropriate action in that…
I liked your response a lot. Thank you. And I was almost persuaded by it. In fact I was persuaded for about 5 minutes after reading it. But at the last second, a thought occurred to me: if there's a deficiency in…