I can understand why Chelsea Manning would want to do that, given the insane sentence. Essentially they're saying that Chelsea is more dangerous than two murderers, when in reality she just embarrassed powerful people and the US internationally. Plus the ill treatment they have received[0] has to have an impact on mental health.
Best case scenario, someone in the White House eventually releases her. But I wouldn't expect that to be Obama or Clinton who she has embarrassed, instead it may be whoever follows Clinton in 2024.
PS - Just to be clear, I never said Chelsea Manning doesn't deserve ANY jail time. I am just saying that 35 years is bonkers. It should have been 1-5 with a dishonorable discharge and banned from access to classified information.
Without regard to the original crimes, I think the pre-trial confinement and other conditions were not what I'd expect from the US Government -- I'm in favor of any detainee, particularly a servicemember, being given the level of care and access to speedy/fair trial guaranteed by the constitution. This wasn't met in this case.
I hope she endures and is eventually released early -- taking the conditions pretrial and post-trial into account as a substantial mitigating factor.
5 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 15.3 ms ] threadBest case scenario, someone in the White House eventually releases her. But I wouldn't expect that to be Obama or Clinton who she has embarrassed, instead it may be whoever follows Clinton in 2024.
PS - Just to be clear, I never said Chelsea Manning doesn't deserve ANY jail time. I am just saying that 35 years is bonkers. It should have been 1-5 with a dishonorable discharge and banned from access to classified information.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_Manning#Detention
I hope she endures and is eventually released early -- taking the conditions pretrial and post-trial into account as a substantial mitigating factor.