Here's what I would ask (in addition to the ones already listed)
- What is your current runway and burn rate?
- How much funding has been raised at what evaluation and type(s) of equity?
- What % of the company are my shares?
- What is the founder(s) background and expertise?
If you're interviewing for a startup, don't focus on the product at all, that will change. Focus on the founders and core team. Those are the people that matter. Are they CEO/CTO/CMO/etc level material? Mature, focused, driven? Able to accept harsh truths and make tough calls? Have a strong vision for the future, but are pragmatic now? Can you see them being able to fire someone? Negotiate with other companies?
If they don't seem to have what it takes to go from a tiny startup to big company, you may want to reconsider.
For small companies, it's very reasonable to ask, at minimum, their runway. There's a big difference between 3 months and 18 months, and this is very relevant to your decision, particularly if you're currently employed.
If the runway is less than 6 months, it's reasonable to tell them to complete the raise and email you when they're done. A friend of mine was laid off less than 4 months after a startup talked him into leaving apple because they didn't get their raise done.
I'd also ask when they're going to raise their next round on -- what features / milestones / usage / whatever get the raise done in the ceo's mind. And where they are on getting the aforementioned accomplished. I would prefer the ceo to know this off the top of his or her head.
I'm interested in this as well. I've been thinking about doing a startup with no stock options. Budgeting an average of about $125K in W2 salaries for developer types in the Austin/Dallas (or remote). (I realize that this would be light for the Bay Area or NYC).
It's a new company, so I cal it a "startup" (although we may elect not to do a raise for a year or so), but I don't think it's fair to ask the developers to fund the company through reduced salary in return for lottery tickets. Everyone ends up feeling a bit raw if they've been eating cat food for 3 years and it then doesn't work out...
I was thinking of a profit distribution once we hit that point - say 24 months in. 20% of last year's EBITDA quarterly to employees this year or some such. Of course if I've taken on any outside money by that time, those investors are certain to have opinions about that...
That way we don't have to worry about options needing to be exercised, or the cash-out-of-pocket tax hit of RSUs (until some legislation to fix that problem makes it through someday...)
I'm happy to share success with the team that made the enterprise successful, but most of the stock based bonus instruments have some 'gotchas' that end up hurting the wrong people...
Does that (the profit sharing) sound as if it might be a reasonable incentive structure? Or would you as an exemplary candidate want stock even though the company had no hard-and-fast plans for an exit. (Of course, these days, who does?)
It's a bit funny that Jim Halbert from The Office wouldn't have had much success hiring under these guidelones, not that the format the writers produced was a successful one. More like an escapist rendition by the modern day lottery called the "startup".
Thanks for the feedback. Those questions I usually leave for founders/investors only. The point of this exercise is to find a set of questions about the health, team culture, and growth potential of the company across a broad set of relevant employees and/or partners who may not necessarily know these details.
Of course, if you're talking to a founder, then these questions are definitely must-ask.
That's a good follow-up question, especially for those who recently joined in the last 6 months. As noted, this set of questions work best to ask across the sample because I started to notice trends.
Why is it the single best question? Most companies do not hire engineers for their growth potential. Most hire for a very exact fit and then pay for exactly that. That's one reason most companies are constantly bemoaning the "shortage of talent". I put that in quotes because I don't believe there is a shortage, just a lack of focus across the board to acquire and nurture talent and general software engineering aptitude.
I was interviewing a candidate in a technical interview and it was a question they asked me.
I was impressed because it made me think, and it showed that the candidate wasn't just looking for a job, but was looking for a job in which they could learn and grow their skills.
> When considering any startup, you should always ask to meet the [investors]. If they don’t let you meet or speak candidly with these individuals, then run as far away as possible.
This seems a bit odd to me... Maybe it could work on a place like San Francisco where a lot of VC companies are located. I guess you can just meet them during lunch or for coffee.
But how would you manage that on a european startup where a lot of investors come from different countries with different timezones? Are you saying that every potencial hire should schedule a skype meeting with each investor?
Also, what about crowd-funded companies? Do you still contact every investor, even though some of them might just have chipped in $100 bucks because they saw a video pitch?
In today's world, "meet" doesn't necessarily have to be in person. What's more important is to have a conversation with a representative sample of the people and/or partners you could be working that's related to the role you're interviewing for.
Re: crowd-funded companies -> See last point. In the end, the most important are the people actually working on the product.
> When considering any startup, you should always ask to meet the founders, investors and any relevant people (employee, external partners, vendors, etc) you would be working with...
Unless you will be working with the founders and investors, you won't and shouldn't meet with them. Find out what working there is like for your potential peers, and whether you'd like working with them. Maybe your job would be working with one of the founders (technical architect say) or maybe the company is still so small that the founding team all fits around a table. In THAT case it makes sense to talk to the founders, because you'll be working with them.
24 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 67.6 ms ] thread- What is your current runway and burn rate?
- How much funding has been raised at what evaluation and type(s) of equity?
- What % of the company are my shares?
- What is the founder(s) background and expertise?
If you're interviewing for a startup, don't focus on the product at all, that will change. Focus on the founders and core team. Those are the people that matter. Are they CEO/CTO/CMO/etc level material? Mature, focused, driven? Able to accept harsh truths and make tough calls? Have a strong vision for the future, but are pragmatic now? Can you see them being able to fire someone? Negotiate with other companies?
If they don't seem to have what it takes to go from a tiny startup to big company, you may want to reconsider.
I can't think of any possible scenario where a company would hand that information to an outsider.
Perhaps try something a little more subtle on the non-executives and look for warning signs:
- Does the company use a payroll service?
- Have you ever been paid late, even by one day?
- Have you ever been offered alternate compensation (say, a few more shares instead of your weekly check)?
If the runway is less than 6 months, it's reasonable to tell them to complete the raise and email you when they're done. A friend of mine was laid off less than 4 months after a startup talked him into leaving apple because they didn't get their raise done.
I'd also ask when they're going to raise their next round on -- what features / milestones / usage / whatever get the raise done in the ceo's mind. And where they are on getting the aforementioned accomplished. I would prefer the ceo to know this off the top of his or her head.
Here is a question for you or anyone else. What if the answer is none?
What is the atypical reaction/response?
I've always worked for companies way out of the start-up zone and thus a salary was my only compensation.
If the answer IS none. Are you expecting a bump in salary? Working on things futuristic or edgy? Promotion in a year?
What is the counter?
Thanks
It's a new company, so I cal it a "startup" (although we may elect not to do a raise for a year or so), but I don't think it's fair to ask the developers to fund the company through reduced salary in return for lottery tickets. Everyone ends up feeling a bit raw if they've been eating cat food for 3 years and it then doesn't work out...
That way we don't have to worry about options needing to be exercised, or the cash-out-of-pocket tax hit of RSUs (until some legislation to fix that problem makes it through someday...)
I'm happy to share success with the team that made the enterprise successful, but most of the stock based bonus instruments have some 'gotchas' that end up hurting the wrong people...
Does that (the profit sharing) sound as if it might be a reasonable incentive structure? Or would you as an exemplary candidate want stock even though the company had no hard-and-fast plans for an exit. (Of course, these days, who does?)
Of course, if you're talking to a founder, then these questions are definitely must-ask.
Also: 'what is your most favorite part about working here?' and then follow up with "what is your least favorite part about working here?'
The latter is guaranteed to cause discomfort if the work environment is toxic, without being impolite or crude.
0: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kohkim
1: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/mobcrush-2
"How has working for your company helped you grow as a developer?"
I was impressed because it made me think, and it showed that the candidate wasn't just looking for a job, but was looking for a job in which they could learn and grow their skills.
This seems a bit odd to me... Maybe it could work on a place like San Francisco where a lot of VC companies are located. I guess you can just meet them during lunch or for coffee.
But how would you manage that on a european startup where a lot of investors come from different countries with different timezones? Are you saying that every potencial hire should schedule a skype meeting with each investor?
Also, what about crowd-funded companies? Do you still contact every investor, even though some of them might just have chipped in $100 bucks because they saw a video pitch?
Re: crowd-funded companies -> See last point. In the end, the most important are the people actually working on the product.
Unless you will be working with the founders and investors, you won't and shouldn't meet with them. Find out what working there is like for your potential peers, and whether you'd like working with them. Maybe your job would be working with one of the founders (technical architect say) or maybe the company is still so small that the founding team all fits around a table. In THAT case it makes sense to talk to the founders, because you'll be working with them.