To those not old enough to remember, yes tv sets looked like that and there was usually only one, maybe two tops in any given house. I remember that the big event of the decade entertainment wise was when my family got a Sony Trinitron Color TV. Boy was that nice compared to black and white.
And to those not older enough ;), I remember that on Thursday nights (there was a famous quiz show on television) my grandmother invited the neighbours (which had not a TV set at all) to come and watch it together (it was a house with four apartments).
And then I remember the surprise when the first colour TV sets came into use (at first they were only in bars and similar), the first main event were the Olympic Games of 1976 (Montreal) all the people crowded there to see the grass (more or less) green, the water blue ...
In a weird coincidence, I watched the movie "Network" (1976) with my wife & kids last night, none of whom had ever seen it. They liked it. It didn't even feel very dated, despite the fact that the televisions all looked like the one in this picture. The complexity of the dialogue in the movie astonished us. More was expected of the audience back then.
you mean it wasn't watered down for the lowest common denominator like the user interfaces of today?
edit: to clarify, I do not mean things like accessibility, I mean "beautiful" user interfaces that are frustrating for power users. just a sideways rant.
One of the strengths of Network is the lack of music. In fact if I remember correctly the opening scene is just the camera moving through a newsroom with ambient sound.
I'm sure you can find lots of bad and shallow movies released in 1976 (e.g. a rather bad remake of King Kong) though there were also a number of good films in addition to Network (All the President's Men, Taxi Driver, Rocky). Network was particularly good though and seems rather prescient today.
An artist friend of mine started a 'zero likes' groupon FB where people were encouraged to share awesome content but would get booted from the group if they used the voting button. It drastically changed the shape of conversation (group members were a subset of a small existing community).
The whole time I'm reading the description up to the shot, I'm thinking "luck favors the prepared." So it was nice to see the photographer basically agrees: Turner is sanguine about his success; he called it a “lucky shot”, if luck is “skill and opportunity meeting at the same time.”
i'm impressed by his decision to trigger by sound rather than trusting his eyes: it gave him the chance to set up a more novel shot ahead of time.
incidentally, it's pretty much the same that doc edgerton used for many of his bullet photos: you start a picture in bulb mode in a dark room and use a sound trigger and time delay to trigger a strobe based on roughly how long you expect the delay between the sound of the bullet firing and it hitting the thing you care about.
Once you have a rough window, you can spend the rest of your time fine tuning the delay for whatever effect you're going for.
now putting on my dan meyer hat, it feels like a fun exercise to determine his reaction time based on the approximate speed of the car (possibly derivable if we know the shutter speed?) anyhow, cool article.
One of the interesting things, which may not be obvious, is that using a strobe in a dark room like that actually lets you see the bullet location with your naked eye. You didn't need to use a Polaroid to "see" the position.
The microphone is best triggered on the shock wave of a supersonic bullet. Accidentally shot a mic once trying to get it to trigger off a subsonic air pellet :-)
18 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 51.3 ms ] threadedit: to clarify, I do not mean things like accessibility, I mean "beautiful" user interfaces that are frustrating for power users. just a sideways rant.
Music can date a film badly.
The following year Star Wars was released, so I guess 1976 was the last year of movies with complex dialogue. :)
Or maybe, instead, there has always been a wide range of dialogue complexity in films.
"Like Us on Facebook"
incidentally, it's pretty much the same that doc edgerton used for many of his bullet photos: you start a picture in bulb mode in a dark room and use a sound trigger and time delay to trigger a strobe based on roughly how long you expect the delay between the sound of the bullet firing and it hitting the thing you care about.
Once you have a rough window, you can spend the rest of your time fine tuning the delay for whatever effect you're going for.
now putting on my dan meyer hat, it feels like a fun exercise to determine his reaction time based on the approximate speed of the car (possibly derivable if we know the shutter speed?) anyhow, cool article.
The microphone is best triggered on the shock wave of a supersonic bullet. Accidentally shot a mic once trying to get it to trigger off a subsonic air pellet :-)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Marsh_3