After getting that update, I noticed that every news suggestion was something that interested me and that I'd actually read it. It was eerie, but sort of satisfying that it wasn't littered with sports or celebrity news or "feel good" stories like it once was.
I have to say I was pretty disappointed at Google for pushing their "use the iPhone Gmail app" popup to me : They have plenty of data about my usages, and it was easy enough to figure out I never owned an iPhone, or accessed any of their services using an iPhone.
And to be honest, if they somehow did, I would be even more scared of their power than now. I don't want to depend on one single company for every detail of my digital life, thank you very much. Just as I don't want to trust one single company with all of my digital data.
IMO Facebook is just 9gag now, plus a huge dose of fake news, it's a shitty forum-type of site like digg or reddit but with terrible UI (here are the top 50 comments, you want the rest, keep clicking "More..."). Nobody shares anything personal anymore, it's just weblinks and, as I said, 9gag-ish content, plus people raging on topics like politics. I think the youth are now sharing their lives through the Snapchat-features of WhatsApp and Instagram, but lucky for Facebook they also own these 2.
If Google (as rumoured) redesigned their homepage to give you a personalized "news feed", that will eat Facebook's lunch. They need some social features to keep people engaged though.
The utility of Facebook outside chat and events is gone. They don't let you see posts anymore, just "your friend tagged their other friend in this meme".
Sometimes I think that the only features FB uses internally are events and groups. They're the only parts of the site that do what you want them to do well and intuitively.
Plenty of my friends share personal stuff to group of friends on FB.
There are many very active specific topic groups, e.g. 40k fans, asian food cooking groups, which are much more active than say reddit groups for the same topic. Facebook is still regular people choice.
The contents of your newsfeed are mostly determined by the people you befriend and the pages you like, as modified by your mute settings. If your feed is full of garbage, try changing those parameters. Plenty of people have a good experience because they have given inputs that reflect what they really want to see. The same is true on many other sites, BTW, and across sites as well. If all of the content on SuperCoolTechNews was garbage, would you still visit or follow their RSS feed? Even Google creates a filter bubble based on what you've searched for and which results you've clicked on.
The internet is becoming ever more personalized. Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing for you largely depends on your own behavior.
Somehow I am using more google than facebook (removed the damn bloated app that eats all the free space on my old phone). Subjectively Google just might succeed in things like Feed because Facebook is for situations where you want to know what the other guys around you are doing. Google is about what is happening generally like news or blog posts or announcements or anything interesting but not personal.
Can't beat Facebook at social network but at everything else Google can use similar features to solidify their market.
Facebook leveraging its userbase to mimic snapchat stories and Google rolling out their feed on their mobile app to solve the Google Now vs Google Assistant dichotomy aren't really similar. Google trying to take on Social Giant behemoth by making an interactive non-social feed on their mobile app makes for a nice headline though.
Facebook did not invent pushing people towards their native apps by a long shot. Most websites with a native app urge their users to download apps for more engagement. Calling it a Facebook "feature" is laughable.
My opinion on this would be simple. If Google want it to do, then it should do the way exactly Facebook did to snap, a pixel by pixel copy/paste. Also, besides facebook there is importance of having another social networking site, clearly google plus failed, now Google should do it on a new frame.
Google will never figure out how to do social apps well. They have failed repeatedly to make anything resembling a good social platform, and the one that came anywhere close (Google Chat), they killed and replaced with a succession of moribund, inferior replacements which are all being killed off in succession. (Hangouts is dead within a year, supposedly; Allo and Duo are not doing well either, and there's a totally new one coming.)
It's funny how their replacement are consistently worse than what they replaced. You mentioned Google Chat, which was pretty great, followed by Hangouts which I'd still very good (arguably the best one out there that still exists), but succeeded by something that had no redeeming qualities at all.
Then we have Picasa which was succeeded by Photos. I like to be able to sort my photos, thanks.
Google Plus still doesn't have a public API.
Do you remember when it was possible to compile an Android application in seconds? Before you had to spend 30 seconds for Gradle to do absolutely nothing?
And Google reader was replaced by, well whatever they want you to use instead is not something I want to use.
20 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 15.8 ms ] threadThere's just no way Google can beat them at their own game.
That is not the internet I want.
If Google (as rumoured) redesigned their homepage to give you a personalized "news feed", that will eat Facebook's lunch. They need some social features to keep people engaged though.
So much for "connecting people".
Sometimes I think that the only features FB uses internally are events and groups. They're the only parts of the site that do what you want them to do well and intuitively.
2017: the year Google Plus crushes Facebook!
The internet is becoming ever more personalized. Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing for you largely depends on your own behavior.
Can't beat Facebook at social network but at everything else Google can use similar features to solidify their market.
Facebook leveraging its userbase to mimic snapchat stories and Google rolling out their feed on their mobile app to solve the Google Now vs Google Assistant dichotomy aren't really similar. Google trying to take on Social Giant behemoth by making an interactive non-social feed on their mobile app makes for a nice headline though.
Facebook did not invent pushing people towards their native apps by a long shot. Most websites with a native app urge their users to download apps for more engagement. Calling it a Facebook "feature" is laughable.
Then we have Picasa which was succeeded by Photos. I like to be able to sort my photos, thanks.
Google Plus still doesn't have a public API.
Do you remember when it was possible to compile an Android application in seconds? Before you had to spend 30 seconds for Gradle to do absolutely nothing?
And Google reader was replaced by, well whatever they want you to use instead is not something I want to use.