No, that's not hard to argue with at all. There are plenty of good reasons they should not do that.
BTW, that article is despicable. It basically takes a tragedy and then goes and finds some obscure links as argument why the publication and it's fellows should be the sole source of available information.
4 comments
[ 2.1 ms ] story [ 9.3 ms ] threadUnless you are some kind of free speech rights absolutist it's hard to argue with the examples in this article. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/10/googl...
That Google should manually de-list 4-Chan?
No, that's not hard to argue with at all. There are plenty of good reasons they should not do that.
BTW, that article is despicable. It basically takes a tragedy and then goes and finds some obscure links as argument why the publication and it's fellows should be the sole source of available information.