Do you find it the least bit ironic that you learned that from a admittedly liberal talk show host who's videos are pushed on YouTube while conservatives who create similar content are demonetized?
I disagree A database for 1.3 million users? You can use off the shelf software. 350 million? You need a entirely different class of solution.
The reason the government doesn't do that is talented people don't want to work for them. Virtually all the government jobs are union and pay is primarily based on time served. You'd be getting third rate talent at best.
>The government is also not operated on a for-profit basis incentivizing doing the bare minimum level of security to shield yourself from liability. No instead they hire contractors for that purpose.
The government is at least equally incompetent if not more so, at least if a private entity screws up you can sue.
You know in movies where the villain rich kid goes to a nice upper middle class home and calls the place a dump? That's what the global poor (as in virtually everyone on the planet) see when western "poor people"…
That perception becomes even more laughable when you realize that the 51 year old female in question is in the top .3% of income globally, while the "permanent underclass" are in the .4% - .8%.
"No check, no tech." is something I use often.
Wouldn't that mean it's less of a capitalism problem and more of a problem generally since it hasn't been solved in any other economic system in practice?
>It really is remarkable how efficient capitalism is at ensuring that proles are born with nothing and die with nothing. Compared to what?
Free proxy and CGI proxy alone used to generate lots of fake results. As "start using cgiproxy" is the title of a cgiproxy page you'd typically get less false positives.
I never thought about it before but wouldn't bringing more people into the first world increase global carbon output?
I had no idea facebook was operating in that space.
>It would be nice if we went back to business models where companies sell products to their end users and not sell their end users to others. If you include services in that you are talking about what, 98% of economic…
Don't want to remind the states that they have the option, they might vote in term limits or remove money from politics.
How did your wife and kids take it when you lost your house and you all had in move in with your mother?
"What myopic lives they had 1000 years ago" - Future historians reading this blog post
Flood insurance can be revoked in the way you describe but it is a federal matter not a Texas one.
But I'm talking about deaths, I have yet to see even one case yet this is supposedly an epidemic. Sorry if I'm not convinced by statistical handwaving.
So according to your response they don't die from a doctor refusing to provide care as much as they die from fear of bankruptcy? Aren't they poor? So isn't it safe to assume they don't have tons of assets to lose when…
Certainly 10 specific cases would be an easy find right? Seriously go look. You can't find them. Studies like this claim cases like "well if we found this cancer earlier" but I'm looking for "he couldn't afford this…
45,000!?! you should easily be able to point out say 10 specific cases where lack of access to a drug killed someone in the last year right?
Have any examples of deaths? Should be thousands available.
Why not give to charity? That's what I do.
I had a software company put me into their newsletter list once.
Do you find it the least bit ironic that you learned that from a admittedly liberal talk show host who's videos are pushed on YouTube while conservatives who create similar content are demonetized?
I disagree A database for 1.3 million users? You can use off the shelf software. 350 million? You need a entirely different class of solution.
The reason the government doesn't do that is talented people don't want to work for them. Virtually all the government jobs are union and pay is primarily based on time served. You'd be getting third rate talent at best.
>The government is also not operated on a for-profit basis incentivizing doing the bare minimum level of security to shield yourself from liability. No instead they hire contractors for that purpose.
The government is at least equally incompetent if not more so, at least if a private entity screws up you can sue.
You know in movies where the villain rich kid goes to a nice upper middle class home and calls the place a dump? That's what the global poor (as in virtually everyone on the planet) see when western "poor people"…
That perception becomes even more laughable when you realize that the 51 year old female in question is in the top .3% of income globally, while the "permanent underclass" are in the .4% - .8%.
"No check, no tech." is something I use often.
Wouldn't that mean it's less of a capitalism problem and more of a problem generally since it hasn't been solved in any other economic system in practice?
>It really is remarkable how efficient capitalism is at ensuring that proles are born with nothing and die with nothing. Compared to what?
Free proxy and CGI proxy alone used to generate lots of fake results. As "start using cgiproxy" is the title of a cgiproxy page you'd typically get less false positives.
I never thought about it before but wouldn't bringing more people into the first world increase global carbon output?
I had no idea facebook was operating in that space.
>It would be nice if we went back to business models where companies sell products to their end users and not sell their end users to others. If you include services in that you are talking about what, 98% of economic…
Don't want to remind the states that they have the option, they might vote in term limits or remove money from politics.
How did your wife and kids take it when you lost your house and you all had in move in with your mother?
"What myopic lives they had 1000 years ago" - Future historians reading this blog post
Flood insurance can be revoked in the way you describe but it is a federal matter not a Texas one.
But I'm talking about deaths, I have yet to see even one case yet this is supposedly an epidemic. Sorry if I'm not convinced by statistical handwaving.
So according to your response they don't die from a doctor refusing to provide care as much as they die from fear of bankruptcy? Aren't they poor? So isn't it safe to assume they don't have tons of assets to lose when…
Certainly 10 specific cases would be an easy find right? Seriously go look. You can't find them. Studies like this claim cases like "well if we found this cancer earlier" but I'm looking for "he couldn't afford this…
45,000!?! you should easily be able to point out say 10 specific cases where lack of access to a drug killed someone in the last year right?
Have any examples of deaths? Should be thousands available.
Why not give to charity? That's what I do.
I had a software company put me into their newsletter list once.