Ask HN: Middle School family biz founder; now adult, and parents have all equity
I’ve been around HN for the better part of a decade, and really feeling like I could use the collective advice of the community. I'm using an anon account because of HN contacts irl. If you do recognize my story, I'd ask that you email me privately.
The short version of my story is that my father and I built a company together from essentially nothing when I was in middle school and we worked together through high school (~$1 million in yearly revenue) and college (~$3 million in yearly revenue).
When I would ask about maybe getting paid, my father would tell me that the company was going to be mine one day. That there was no sense in him paying me, because the company doing well was good for the me, and the work I did was creating a better company for myself. Would I want to take over a big company, or a smaller company?
Now an adult, I have no equity, and he's 100% in control. I have no leverage, and almost no voice in the company I created. Cut out by someone I trusted.
There's so much more to the story, but the text limit on HN posts wasn't enough to express it fully.
Here is the Full Version: https://pastebin.com/JDGUtT3Q
48 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 115 ms ] threadI would have a conversation with yourself about what you want the end result of this to look like. What's the best outcome here for you? What's the worst? What about for your parents? And I'm not just talking about the cash: is it worth it to press this if it means losing your family?
One can consult a lawyer without bringing any action, which could be invaluable in providing an objective, outside opinion.
Sadly, I know from experience that family ties are no insurance against mistreatment, financial or otherwise.
I've already decided it isn't worth it. I have no plans to lawyer up in this situation.
Even if you don't take equity as the payoff to the time you invested in working on this project, if you were really unpaid during all those years working on it, you likely have a strong case under employment law if nothing else, if you can document time you spent on it. It sounds like your father really took advantage of your naivete here. I can't imagine doing something like this with my son. Even if I didn't think his involvement warranted equity, paying him for working on it would be done without question.
There's a lot to learn here, obviously. One thing I'm picking up on reading your pastebin is that this is a company that grew to at least several employees, and operated without your involvement for at least a few years. There's a lot that goes into building a company, and just being around for the start of it doesn't entitle someone to half the company—this is why vesting schedules are a thing. So its worth looking hard at your expectations and being brutally honest with yourself about the role you played in the formation of the company. At the end of that, though, if you're able to honestly conclude that your role was absolutely integral to the formation of the company, you should stand firm in demanding to be compensated for that.
Absent an employment or contractual agreement that makes your code a work-for-hire, you own the copyright to any code you write. If you don't have any agreements in place with the company your father started with you, then you still own the copyright to the code you presumably wrote during the early days. Even if they had developers who later built upon that, their copyright is derivative. They can't do anything with it without your agreement, including sell the company, the software, or really even deploy it if push comes to shove. I'm assuming you can prove your own copyright in the form of source control.
I've been through exactly this situation with a client, and if I hadn't had that card to play I'd have gotten royally screwed dealing with them. I don't know if I ever really got as much out as I put in, but it made me almost-whole. (and you can reach out to me if you want the full story there, I'm not going to put it on HN.)
Let's talk about value. There are three types of value, in my mind: wisdom value, cash value, and potential value.
The cash value of this experience is your salary. You don't seem happy with it.
The wisdom value of this experience is hopefully clear: Take ownership, have things written down on paper, and don't do work for free. Also, another nugget of wisdom: Many people here on HN have been screwed in situations where they thought they were getting equity and they weren't - the difference is you lost it to family. This is actually not that bad. I'll explain later. The main point is to not make the mistake of doing free work for no equity again.
The potential value is pretty much zero. You're not going to get much more from this company, at least compared to the opportunity cost of working for a different startup that values you or starting your own. You've fooled yourself that there is potential because "you started it" and "you deserve it." but there isn't and you're screwed. Accept it.
From the little information I have, I think your next best action is clear: move on, do something new. Start a new company, you clearly have the chops and the experience. You have a distinct advantage over most people starting companies because your family is also made up of business people. (I know I know - your hear is sinking - but stay focused on being rational.) But this makes you incredibly lucky.
Lets say you move on - work for a new company - start your own - whatever. You live life. In 10 years you're married and you have a baby. Your parents are getting old and the company now has a lot of liquid assets and everyone is super comfortable. Your parents now buy you a house, or set up a trust for your kid to go to college. Very few people have this. You, again, become incredibly lucky. Your brother, too, will get these benefits. What luck! What a wonderful life all the cousins will have.
There is an African folk story about a man who fell from a very tall tree onto a medium size tree, and then from a medium size tree on to the ground. He was all scratched up, but he survived because of the interim tree. An elder looked at him scowling and reminded him, "don't ask god why, when you should tell him thank you!"
You made your family rich. You achieved IT, and I hope one day after the rawness of the emotions fades, you can feel pride about this entire experience. Your parents did not do the right thing - but thats okay, few people do. Maybe one day they will. But it is THEIR choice - the ball is in their court. These choices are difficult. Thankfully, it's not your choice! Forgive, learn, move on, and be thankful!
I do believe there is hope for reconciliation here, but if not, you are correct that I shouldn't let my ties to the company be something I can't shake off.
Maybe start the same company all over again and go after your old customers. See how Pop handles that one.
2) Doesn't matter if you fight it or not. Don't let this hold you back. You have gone through the process, you know what it takes to build a business. Start your own, it might work out immediately, but keep trying. Only keep working for the company if the pay is enough, if you can command more pay go get a job else where. Work for the company as a consultant and charge higher pay. So instead of say $20/hr 40hrs a week. They can have you on retainer for $200/week for 1hr and after that $50/hr. Assuming you don't have much to do. That way you make more money working else where, but you still stay active in the company and hopeful the extra money will turn to more savings you can pile into your future venture.
Best of luck.
Your father sounds like a snake, by the way.
My father's stance is very perplexing to me as well. He's a great guy, but when it comes to business, I'm sometimes surprised by the ruthlessness.
No matter what the legal situation is, emotionally this is your company as well, and I can't imagine how hard it must be to stop working there.
Talking with an objective outsider might give you some perspective on how best to set boundaries, to be involved but still respected and properly valued for your work.
Although "snake" is a strong word, it may be apt -- it does seem that your father continues to use your emotional attachment to the company as a bargaining chip against you.
My situation is a bit different: My grandfather was killed in a a car accident by an extremely over-worked trucker and we get a very large settlement, millions, out of it. Terrible tragedy. My grand-mother was severely brain damaged, basically lobotomized and has to live with help.
This was in the late 90s.
Ever since, the amount of mis-handling, under-handed dealings, and outright stupidity of my aunts in regards to this money has been astounding. Together, they managed to piss away ALL of the money and pull in a fair share of debt in the meantime.
My parents were more in your position: On the outside looking in, not wanting to throw down legally with family members. Waiting and hand wringing and hoping for the best go them nowhere.
In the end, I got to work 40 hours a week and go to night-school though college, when REALLY, the entire family should have been comfortable and highly educated for an entire generation.
It's been battle-royale, lord-of-the-files for years on end. I tell this story to elucidate you on a very specific point: Just because they're family does not mean they are going to watch out for you. OR, they can just simply be not as intelligent as you are, and make decisions that seem rational to them.
Or they can lie to themselves, and construct a false narrative where they are the good guys, and you are the bad guy. I suspect your father has written your contributions out of his mind, and replaced them with his own.
People see the dollar signs and lose sight of what's important. I've since just forgiven everyone and let it go. That's the decision you have to make, and make it quickly: Drop it and be on good terms with your family, or get a lawyer and quit kidding around.
edit: I'll also update that I struggled with this for years and years. What finally lead me to acceptance and living a much happier life was therapy. Talking with my therapist about the decisions people made, the greediness I saw, the irrationality of the decisions, and the betrayal of my family members.
Talking through it, processing it, and contextualizing with my therapist was enormously helpful.
It doesn't guarantee a trouble free time, but it at least avoids the tragic and very common "miscommunications".
Depending on how much time you initially put into the company, he may have also been in violation of child labor laws.
But the reality is that you saving the company helped you stay fed, clothed and sheltered, so you at least got that much out of it. And when you walked away, it began to unravel.
You need to read some negotiating books and decide what you want. You need to look to the future, not the past.
You need to put in writing what you want, such as "I get X amount of equity and credit for helping build this company or I go get a different job." Don't argue about the past, what's fair, how you helped build it, etc.
I would make it clear that I don't think the company can thrive without you. You saved it twice now.
But that doesn't mean it will get through to your father. You need to be fully prepared to leave if he doesn't give you what you want. The odds are good that he won't.
If the company gets into trouble again after you leave and they again ask you to come back, lawyer up and insist on getting your due. Get it in written contract form, not verbal agreement. If you don't get what you want, don't go back.
You need to make your peace with letting your father fail and going your own way. Or accept that he will always take advantage of you.
You can't really force other people to change. There are so many ways for them to just keep crapping on you if you are insisting on a fairness they don't really believe in. It would probably be best to quietly job hunt and just leave.
Accept that if you do so, the company probably starts its death spiral again. Your father isn't a talented businessman.
If this business's profits paid for yours and your brother's college education, as well as supported the family while you lived there you need to take that into account. You may also want to take into account that even according to your own version of events, your dad had been running this business since before you created the eStore. Plus there's a huge gap in the middle of your story (college + job + own startup) where you didn't work for the business while your brother and dad did.
I guess what I am trying to say is: You deserve equity but not the 50/50 you seem to believe. According to your own version of events (which paints things in the best possible light for you), your dad still did the majority of the work, took the majority of the risk, and was paying for things for you while doing so.
I think your dad's greed is affecting his judgement, but frankly I think it is affecting yours too. As an exercise go rewrite this story from what you think your dad's perspective is, setting out what he did, and how things will look for him.
Again, you deserve equity, and I have no idea what he already gifted you. 20-30% would be in the ballpark of fair. But in general I think you're seeing green a little and just want more power than your brother for later, which isn't a healthy place to come from.
You could go get lawyers involved but win or lose, you'll lose.
> Who paid for college?
I've reflected on this question before. My parents paid for college. Although I went at their urging. I was already writing software every day, to be honest I didn't see the value in a degree.
I started another online business in college, and employed my brother until I sold the company a few years later. My parents gave my brother and I a monthly stipend, but I made multiples of it with the online business.
I also incorporated lessons learned from this company into my father and I's company.
Generally, I agree with all of your points/questions.
> [He] was paying for things for you
I do think about this. But if your child has a skill, does that mean if you cloth them and feed them, you are entitled to work for free? I doubt many would agree there.
> I think you're seeing green a little
There is no discussion to be had if the business wasn't making any money. It wouldn't matter who owned 100% of $0 profit. I was part of building a multi-million dollar company, and the thought of having to redo the sleepless nights (Pulling all-nighters in high school making new stuff or after our shared host upgraded their php install and our shop started segfaulting), just seems crazy. I put in the work and I was a big part of building something great.
> want more power than your brother
Also true. I'm not sure I could disagree with his style of management any more. He is, unfortunately, not able see long term, and will cut his nose to spite his face. We just disagree, and the thought of having to have some kind of 'consensus' about decisions is not appealing.
> I have no idea what he already gifted you
I believe the note just literally just said 'ownership'. And hasn't been mentioned since.
> You could go get lawyers involved but win or lose, you'll lose.
Agreed.
I think you have to decide how much your relationship with your father is worth to you. If you can put a price on it, make darn sure whatever you do next is 100% going to result in that price, or more, and you won't lose any sleep.
Consider for a moment that maybe your father did more to keep the business alive than you think he did, and that maybe you did less to keep it alive than you think you did. You're not crazy to think you're a 50/50 cofounder, but you're probably wrong to think it.
I think you should consider opening your own warehouse across town, doing the exact same thing your current business is doing. Build a better engine, and skim the cream your current business is getting (for the 90% of inventory that generates 10% of the revenues, simply send them the business to keep your new venture and cash burn optimally-sized). Don't clue your family into what you're doing. If your father is essential and irreplaceable to the business model, then your venture could fail. If you're the essential one, then you can gift your family some nonvoting stock after your business takes off and theirs tanks (assuming Amazon doesn't eat both your lunches in the meantime).
But consider this all with the backdrop of only having one family. You can't put a price on that, or at least I can't.
I can say for certain, simply because my father knew absolutely nothing about the internet, and had no money for software, that the company as it exists today would not be a thing.
We had transitioned to 90%+ online sales by the start of high school.
> assuming Amazon doesn't eat both your lunches in the meantime
Funny enough, this is where we differ most about vision for the company.
True, but if your 1 father is a POS then having a father is worthless.
Gary Vaynerchuk grew his father's brick and mortar liquor store from 4MM in sales to 60MM in sales on the back of digital advertising and ecommerce. He didn't get any equity in his father's company either. His salary also wasn't lavish. When Gary was in his 30s, he left his father's business and launched his own company.
You could take what you have learned from building your father's business and launch a company on your own, where you control the equity and call the shots. If you're not happy with how your family wants to compensate you, wouldn't it be better to forge a path on your own rather than expend time and energy fighting with family?
If you look on youtube for GaryVee, you can hear how he views all that work he did for his father's company. Hopefully it gives you a new perspective.
Attitude matters, if you think you'll get a war -- you'll get a war.
Perceptions dominate ALL parts of negotiation. When people become angry and uncertain, mistrustful -- they physiologically hear less.
Relative to your father -- is important to take his 'emotional temperature' Figure out the pictures in his head and deal with it. See if those perceptions match.
You're right to love to your folks, support them the best you can. You know your Old Man better than anyone -- What will it take to persuade him?
Where the circle overlaps with your career and business interests -- sadly, lots of people have learned to keep them separated.
Incidentally, you might find Stuart Diamond helpful > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QtZ-vObJrk
Sounds like he will have his own expectations of equity (possibly not an equal share), views on your father's plans (I assume he intends to retire at some point) and view of how involved he thinks you should be in running things. He'll also have a view on how much work you actually did before you got on board and how important that work you did was to the company growth, which sounds like it will be not unfavourable to you (but also perhaps not the same as yours). And lastly, he'll have a better idea than any of us of how persuadable your father is on the issue or whether it's easier just to walk away.
Your father took advantage of you and is taking advantage of you still. If it wasn't obvious to you when the issue of equity arose, it should have been glaring when he refused to pay you a reasonable salary after you returned to save the company.
Your judgement is clouded by the respect you have for your father. To get a sense of what's really going on, replace every occurrence of 'my father' in your story with a neutral name 'George' for instance, then read your own account again.
I get a sense that you are not very an assertive person and that you shy away from confrontation - at least insofar it relates to your father. This is a far from rare trait, but it has worked to your detriment in this case.
The way I see it, you have two options: walk away from the company now and never look back, abandoning all the effort of the past few years or get a lawyer and seek legal redress. What you should not do, is continue to work in this company where your contribution is downplayed and effort is poorly rewarded.
I'd say it's finally time to make some hard choices.
Of course, it could be argued that it was a new business when it exploded on the internet after near-bankruptcy, however, it could be argued the son was just "helping the family business," as their was no formal business agreement (it sounds like). This may be a tough legal battle to get really anything, and sounds like your father would fight it tooth to nail; it may be a a very long road that you don't want to go down.
IMO, you might do better just continuing to help out here and there (as you've got things pretty well in shape it looks like), and distance yourself somewhat both emotionally and energy/work-wise. Lighten up just a bit about it, and you'll likely get 50/50 anyway, when your Dad is ready to stop working/retire. This way, you have a better chance of not fracturing the relationship as well, and it allows you to sort of emotionally unwind.
Yes, continue to be the break/fix guy and the architectural/platform guru as needed, but don't invest that kind of emotional (and actual work/cycles) energy anymore, if you can possibly help it (obviously this will be difficult given the history and attachments etc). Sort of unwind yourself a bit, and I think things may just naturally work out.
> One point that may be lost in all the comments, [...] this was his father's company to begin with.
I've pondered this. There is no disputing (and I try to make this point in the paste) that my father actually brought something to the table. In this case, it was inventory and supplier relationships.
In some respects, the whole thing was so separate from the original company that I used to joke with my father that I should just have the money deposited in my bank account instead of his, and he should just give me a slightly better price on product.
We even discussed changing the name of the company when we transitioned to online-only sales. But, hysterically, the company is named after me, so I argued that it should stay the same, and eventually persuaded him.
Part of me would install log-less rootkits on all critical infrastructure and plant disc corruption and subtle misconfiguration here and there. Not enough to bankrupt the company but enough to drive any hired sysadmin mad, then refuse to answer the phone until the equity demands are met. Ok, don't actually do those illegal things.
I read the full version and I would consider walking away from the business. This would:
1) Save your relationship with your father and brother
2) Hopefully help your mental wellbeing
3) Create new opportunities for you (i.e. start your own business or get a job with a competitive salary)
Whether you like it or not, your father has 100% of the equity and is in control. After multiple conversations, you have no equity and are under-paid. You have three choices:
1) Lawyer up - from your comments, it appears you are unwilling to do this. This would probably destroy your relationship with your family and may not even result in you receiving partial ownership
2)Stay and hope that you receive equity. From what I've read, it'll probably happen when your father retires or passes away. The frustration you have, will probably eat at you and damage your mental health. I would advise against this as you may become bitter and resentful. This would damage your relationship with your father.
3) Leave. It sounds like you are young enough and have a wealth of fantastic experience. Go get a job with a competitive salary or start your own business (maybe re-use your code with permission from your dad). You'll probably still get equity when your father hands over the reigns. Say that you want to stand on your own two feet and have something of your own. Try to maintain a positive relationship. If they need you to fix the software, charge close to market rate and point to the fact they are making millions in sales.
Whatever you choose to do, good luck :)
I know that until a few years ago, he had basically zero retirement savings -- which is different than having no money to spend. But you are probably correct on all counts.
It must be frustrating for you to be in this position. Unfortunately I don't think there is much you can do.
The bright side is that you have amazing experience building up a company and I assume from your other comments, no debt. After multiple attempts, your dad finally has a successful company. You have your health which is your most important asset and you are financially stable.
Trying to put together the timeline, lets say 6 years out of college, so you're maybe in your early thirties. Let's say your Dad had you in his late 20s, early 30s. So he was in his 40s when you and him founded the business, and you were a teen.
Maybe he doesn't think you are ready yet. Maybe he remembered all the mistakes he made in his thirties, and how in his mid forties everything came together when you helped him move online and save his business. But for a business man, all you did was tech stuff. He has seen you follow the start up path out of College and spend 4 years chasing the start-up-lottery dream, and doesn't want to give you $1.5M for you to continue chasing (in his mind) smoke and mirrors.
Maybe while you spent 4 years in college, and he was running the business, with programming employees, he found out that you created a serious hairy mudball that no one but you would ever understand. (I remember some of the first sites and software I made in the early 90s when I first learned web programming and kept building on them because they worked and were in production which now make me shudder to think of).
It might be that he thinks you still have fire to burn and things to prove, and are not ready to take over a company that is running well - that you might makes changes just for the sake of change.
Maybe he fears with more control you would kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.
And he could be very wrong. Made worse by the idea that maybe his assumptions are all wrong, and he is not doing this out of malice (as some commenters are quick to point out) but he genuinely believes he is helping you.
Who knows? We have your side of the story, and though I believe your side is true, it is just half of the story.
/Devil's Advocate
I wish you the best of luck. And I do think your father has some explaining to do.
(My view is formed by my being in my late 40s, having a 6 year old son who I love, and trying to think why my son in 25 years could think that I am a great person, but also think I am screwing him over).
Edit: Spelling
> he found out that you created a serious hairy mudball
No question about it, we're talking about early 00s web development. osCommerce required register_globals to be on. By today's standards, it's an aberration. But, really, quite a few best practice-y things from early 00s look quite antiquated today.
For all it's warts, almost the entire stack remained untouched (just looked at our initial git import from when I returned), as the company revenue hovered around $4m/yr for a few years.
The company's location is not well suited to hire tech talent, and my father tends towards a 'butts-in-the-seats' management style, which really prevented us from hiring someone who could do more than day-to-day bug fixes.
> you would kill the goose that lays the golden eggs
As of a few years ago, my father had basically no retirement savings, and he picked some up a pretty expensive hobbies. I think he's realized he's at retirement age without money to finance his current lifestyle. (A lifestyle that I benefit from, no doubt -- family vacations, family houses, etc).
Thanks again for the comment, it's a great perspective to keep in mind.
Let's try to list the options and see what optimizes for least bitterness/spite.
1. Leave the company to pave your own way.
2. Lawyer up and fight for your right to the company/companies code base. 3. Continue status quo. There are probably situations I haven't accounted for, and the probabilities of these outcomes are largely dependent on you, and your dads personalities. My own bias is probably showing, but I think your best option is to leave the company, and forge your path.That bit about the company being yours some day might well be true, assuming the company outlives your father. I take that to be the meaning of the promise. If he sells the company, there is still the money from that. The promise is only truly broken if he has a will that excludes you.
So, not really a problem there... but you are an adult now and may decide to go elsewhere for better pay or any other reason.